Issues for Mailing list of the AMSM 1.2 Revision Task Force
To comment on any of these issues, send email to amsm-rtf@omg.org. (Please include the issue number in the Subject: header, thusly: [Issue ###].) To submit a new issue, send email to issues@omg.org.
List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)
Issue 13053: Aggregations/Associations in DCPS PSM:
Issue 13231: Error code
Issue 13237: How is a kind of host specified
Issue 13246: Abstract classes link CIM_Action and CIM_Check can be instantiated
Issue 13838: AMSM FTF2 report XMI file
Issue 13053: Aggregations/Associations in DCPS PSM: (amsm-rtf)
Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: THALES (Mr. Willy Boenink, willy.boenink(at)nl.thalesgroup.com)
Nature: Enhancement
Severity: Significant
Summary:
Aggregations/Associations in DCPS PSM: The mapping of aggregations and associations from the PIM model to the DCPS PSM are not always practical. Due to some mapping rules, references are defined more than once, causing potential inconsistencies (e.g. sequence of relations in one topic with Owner reference in the addressed topic). Rules sometimes disable query opportunities (e.g. use of sequences and unions). The DCPS PSM preferably should do without sequences and unions, and redundant information
Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
October 31, 2008: received issue
April 30, 2009: deferred
Discussion: Too much work, too late. Besides, this not an impediment for implementation. DEFERRED. March 2010: Will be addressed in the following RTF period.
Issue 13231: Error code (amsm-rtf)
Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: THALES (Mr. Willy Boenink, willy.boenink(at)nl.thalesgroup.com)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
Summary: The AMS_ErrorCode key value are inconsistent, e.g. key 2 has value AMS_BADCONNECTIVITY, and key 2 has value AMS_BADFILTER
Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
January 13, 2009: received issue
April 30, 2009: deferred
Discussion: No time left. March 2010: Will be addressed in the following RTF period.
Issue 13237: How is a kind of host specified (amsm-rtf)
Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: THALES (Mr. Willy Boenink, willy.boenink(at)nl.thalesgroup.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Significant
Summary: The AMS_DeploymentLinkSpec specifies the host for the deployment. This can be an kind of host (requested hardware). How is a kind of host specified.
Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
January 13, 2009: received issue
April 30, 2009: deferred
Discussion: Need time to think more on that. March 2010: Will be addressed in the following RTF period.
Issue 13246: Abstract classes link CIM_Action and CIM_Check can be instantiated (amsm-rtf)
Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: THALES (Mr. Willy Boenink, willy.boenink(at)nl.thalesgroup.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Significant
Summary: The Application Specification allows the abstract classes like CIM_Action and CIM_Check to be instantiated.
Resolution: No time left. March 2010: Will be addressed in the following RTF period.
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
January 13, 2009: received issue
April 30, 2009: deferred
Issue 13838: AMSM FTF2 report XMI file (amsm-rtf)
Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: Adaptive (Mr. Pete Rivett, pete.rivett(at)adaptive.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary: AMSM FTF2 report XMI file http://doc.omg.org/dtc/09-02-10
[PJR] This is a UML 1.4 XMI 1.1 file, created by a Japanese tool called Jude. It has some structural problems e.g. AssociationEnds owned by the Package not the Association.
Resolution: When resolving other issues (13316, 14091) we decided to move the entire AMSM UML model to a new UML tool (SparxSystems Enterprise Architect) capable of generating better XMI than Jude. This substantial effort has now been finalized and new XMI (version 2.1) has been generated as part of the transfer. The file has been tested against different UML tools, but the vote on that issue has not yet taken place. The new EA UML model file and the XMI file are attached to the FTF document package as non-normative documents (see inventory). It is proposed to vote on this issue as soon as possible in the next RTF period.
Disposition: Deferred
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
March 26, 2009: received issue