Issues for BPMN 1.2 Revision Task Force

To comment on any of these issues, send email to bpmn-rtf@omg.org. (Please include the issue number in the Subject: header, thusly: [Issue ###].) To submit a new issue, send email to issues@omg.org.

List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)

List options: All ; Open Issues only; or Closed Issues only

Issue 11601: Clarify association of artifacts to flows
Issue 11668: Table 9.2
Issue 11669: Table 9.13
Issue 11670: Table A.10
Issue 11671: Table A.10 editorial
Issue 11672: Glossary
Issue 11673: Glossary issue
Issue 11674: Sequence Flow Connection
Issue 11675: Glossary (Adobe p321): under Trigger
Issue 11676: Common Gateway Features
Issue 11677: precisions about the Signal Event
Issue 11678: Figure A.30 is an invalid BPMN 1.1 model
Issue 11679: Figure A.31 is an invalid BPMN 1.1 model
Issue 11680: Figure A.33 is missing an artefact
Issue 11681: Figure A.34 is missing an artefact
Issue 11682: Figure A.35
Issue 11688: Figure 9.23 - An Inclusive Decision using Conditional Sequence Flow
Issue 11689: Figure 10.2 - A Conditional Sequence Flow

Issue 11601: Clarify association of artifacts to flows (bpmn-rtf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: NIST (Mr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov)
Nature:
Severity:
Summary:
In clause 9.7.2 and 10.1.4, it is stated that a data object artifact can be associated with a (Sequence or Message) Flow.
But the meaning of association with a Sequence Flow is not
clearly stated.


In Figure 9.40 there is an example of an association of a data object to a Sequence Flow between two Activities.  Is such an association only permitted when the Flow is between two Activities?  Is it permitted when the flow is between an Activity and a Gateway?


For example, could Figure 9.40 have two activities on the right, with an exclusive data gateway (decision) routing the data object to one or the other under certain conditions?


Is there a meaning to associating the data object with a Sequence Flow that terminates in an Event (throw or catch)?


Proposed Resolution:


When the flow originates from an Activity, the data object is an output of that Activity that is available at the time of the flow.  When the flow terminates in an Activity, the data object is an input to that Activity that is available at the time the Activity starts.  (This is the conclusion to be drawn from the current text.  But these statements are independent of what is on the other end.)


If the flow originates from a gateway or event, BPMN assigns no meaning to the association with respect to that end, but a conforming tool may.


If the flow terminates in a gateway or event, the data object is an "input" artifact that is available when the Gateway decision is made, the Event is thrown, or the wait for the Event begins. The artifact, or the knowledge of its availability, may be used in making the Gateway decision or throwing or handling the Event.


The preferred representation of a data object "flowing" past a gateway or event is to show two (or more) associations:
output from the originating activity and input to the activity (or activities) that use the artifact.  (And there should be an example of this.)


Resolution: Suggested Resolution: Close, No Change: This issue is out of scope for the RTF and will be addressed by the response to the BPMN 2.0 RFP. Revised Text: None Disposition: Closed, deferred
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
October 9, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11668: Table 9.2 (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Table 9.2 (Adobe p66): under "error" the description reads ".. if no
activity in the has such.." a word seems to be missing

Resolution: Suggested Resolution: Close, No Change: This item has already been fixed in the BPMN 1.1 specification Revised Text: None Disposition: Closed, no change
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11669: Table 9.13 (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Table 9.13 (Adobe p75): "for an Intermediate Event within Normal
Flow: if the Trigger is an Error, then the ErrorCode MUST be entered.
This "throws" the error." This indicates that an Intermediate Event
can "throw" an error, which conflicts with Figure 9.5. I guess it
should be 'catches' instead of 'throws'.

Resolution: The following minor text modification will be made to the BPMN 1.1 Specification
Revised Text: Section 9.3.5 “Event Details,” Sub-Section “Error Event Details,” page 51, Table 9.13, first row, second column: remove paragraphs 3 and 4. There is no Error Intermediate Event within the Normal Flow.
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11670: Table A.10 (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Table A.10 (Adobe p176): "this will map to a throw element". There's
only one element allowed to throw errors and that is the
Error-End-Event. This should be fully specified to avoid possible
confusion with the non-existing intermediate-throw-error event

Resolution: Suggested Resolution: Close, No Change: This issue is out of scope for the RTF and will be addressed by the response to the BPMN 2.0 RFP. Revised Text: None Disposition: Closed, deferred
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11671: Table A.10 editorial (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Table A.10 (Adobe p76): "if the Error Event does has an ErrorCode.."

Resolution: The following minor text modification will be made to the BPMN 1.1 Specification
Revised Text: Section A.1.4 “Events,” Sub-Section “Error Intermediate Events,” page 152, Table A.10, third row, second column: paragraph 4. change “If the Error Event does has an…” to “if the Error Event does have an…”.
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11672: Glossary (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Glossary (Adobe p290): End Event - "End Event Results are Message,
Error, Compensation, Link, and Multiple" Link shall be removed

Resolution: The following minor text modification will be made to the BPMN 1.1 Specification
Revised Text: Section “Glossary,” Item “End Event,” page 290, second column: change “…, Link, …” to “…, Signal, …”.
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11673: Glossary issue (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
 Glossary (Adobe p290): under Result – "A result is consequence of
reaching an End Event. Results can be of different types, including:
Message, Error, Compensation, Link and Multiple" Link shall be removed

Resolution: The following minor text modification will be made to the BPMN 1.1 Specification
Revised Text: Section “Glossary,” Item “Result,” page 295, second column: change “…, Link, …” to “…, Signal, …”.
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11674: Sequence Flow Connection (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Sequence Flow Connection (Adobe p72): "an exception to this: an Source link.."

Resolution: Suggested Resolution: Close, No Change: This item has already be fixed in the BPMN 1.1 specification. Revised Text: None Disposition: Closed, no change
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11675: Glossary (Adobe p321): under Trigger (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
 Glossary (Adobe p321): under Trigger: "A trigger is a mechanism that
signals the start of a business process. Triggers are associated with
a Start Events and Intermediate Events and can be of the type:
Message, Timer, Rule, Link, and Multiple" 'Rule' shall be renamed to
'Conditional' and 'a Start Events' should be 'a Start Event'

Resolution: The following minor text modifications will be made to the BPMN 1.1 Specification
Revised Text: a) Section “Glossary,” Item “Trigger,” page 297, second column: change “…, Rule, …” to “…, Conditional, …”. b) Section “Glossary,” Item “Trigger,” page 297, second column: add “…, Signal, …” after “…, Link, …”. c) Section “Glossary,” Item “Trigger,” page 297, second column: Change “…with a Start Events…” to “…with Start Events …”.
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11676: Common Gateway Features (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Common Gateway Features (Adobe p97): "an Gateway MUST NOT .. " and
"An Gateway MUST NOT.."

Resolution: The following minor text modifications will be made to the BPMN 1.1 Specification
Revised Text: a) Section 9.5.1 “Common Gateway Features,” Sub-Section “Message Flow Connections,” page 73, first bullet: change “An Gateway …” to “A Gateway…”. b) Section 9.5.1 “Common Gateway Features,” Sub-Section “Message Flow Connections,” page 73, second bullet: change “An Gateway …” to “A Gateway…”.
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Discussion:


Issue 11677: precisions about the Signal Event (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
I would appreciate some precisions about the Signal Event. Initially
we intended not to have any data associated with it. Yet it has some
properties. I think it makes sense; we indeed need to associate
technical information such as the Name or Id of the instance that
raised it, as well as its TimeStamp. I want to make sure those are
not supposed to be business data. Also I think this part is under
specified, we need to further explain what kind of mechanism should be
used to "listen" to such events, (publish/subscribe pattern ?) as well
as how long such messages are supposed to be kept alive. For instance
on Figure 10.48 (Adobe 322) what is supposed to happen if "B
Completed" is raised before the upper sub process is ready to receive it
?

Resolution: Suggested Resolution: Close, No Change: This issue is out of scope for the RTF and will be addressed by the response to the BPMN 2.0 RFP. Revised Text: None Disposition: Closed, deferred
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11678: Figure A.30 is an invalid BPMN 1.1 model (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
• Figure A.30 is an invalid BPMN 1.1 model (message flows are not
correct, a gateway has two defaults outgoing path, ..)

Resolution: The following minor figure modification will be made to the BPMN 1.1 Specification
Revised Text: Section A.2 “BPMN by Example (Including a Mapping to BPEL4WS),” page 209, Figure A.30: change the “Yes” Sequence Flow outgoing from Decision “Did Enough Members Vote?” from being a Default Sequence Flow to being a normal Sequence Flow.
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11679: Figure A.31 is an invalid BPMN 1.1 model (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
 Figure A.31 is an invalid BPMN 1.1 model (sequence flow pointing to
text, Intermediate Link Event should be used instead)

Resolution: The following minor figure modifications will be made to the BPMN 1.1 Specification
Revised Text: Section A.2.1 “The Beginning of the Process,” page 210, Figure A.31: change the text on the right side of the figure (two places) to Link Intermediate Events (Off-Page Connectors).
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11680: Figure A.33 is missing an artefact (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Figure A.33 is missing an artefact next to the loop symbol to
specify it is an unfolded sub-process

Resolution: Close, No Change: This item requested is not a graphical element of the BPMN 1.1 Specification. There is another issue (Issue 10384), which will be closed and deferred to BPMN 2.0 that will add such a graphical element Revised Text: None Disposition: Closed, no change
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11681: Figure A.34 is missing an artefact (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Figure A.34 is missing an artefact to specify it is an unfolded
sub-process, also intermediate link events should be used.

Resolution: The following minor figure modifications will be made to the BPMN 1.1 Specification. Note that there is no standard icon to show that the Sub-Process is unfolded in the figure. This will be done in BPMN 2.0.
Revised Text: Section A.2.3 “The Second Sub-Process,” page 222, Figure A.34: change the text in four (4) places within the figure to Link Intermediate Events (Off-Page Connectors).
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11682: Figure A.35 (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Source: Axway Software (Mr. Sylvain Astier, sastier(at)axway.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:
Figure A.35: intermediate link event should be used

Resolution: The following minor figure modification will be made to the BPMN 1.1 Specification
Revised Text: Section A.2.4 “The End of the Process,” page 229, Figure A.35: change the text in four (4) places within the figure to Link Intermediate Events (Off-Page Connectors).
Actions taken:
November 18, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11688: Figure 9.23 - An Inclusive Decision using Conditional Sequence Flow (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary:
A source Gateway MUST NOT be of type AND (Parallel). A assume that the gateway MUST NOT be of type XOR as well.

Resolution: In this case, a Gateway can be Exclusive (XOR), but it cannot be Complex. Thus, the text requires a modification
Revised Text: Section 9.5.3 “Inclusive Gateways,” page 82, second bullet on page: add “or Complex” to the end of the bullet sentence.
Actions taken:
November 27, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue

Issue 11689: Figure 10.2 - A Conditional Sequence Flow (bpmn-rtf)

Click
here for this issue's archive.
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary:
A Sequence Flow that has an Exclusive Data-Based Gateway or an activity as its source can also be defined with a condition expression of Default. Such Sequence Flow will have a marker to show that it is a Default flow. I believe that the condition expression of Default can be set to Sequence Flow that has an Inclusive Gateway as its source as well as the above mentioned. It naturally results from what is written on page 82 about Inclusive Gateways diverging behaviour

Resolution: Suggested Resolution: Close, No Change: This issue is out of scope for the RTF and will be addressed by the response to the BPMN 2.0 RFP. Revised Text: None Disposition: Closed, deferred
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
November 27, 2007: received issue
July 18, 2008: closed issue