Issues for 2nd CORBA/e Finalization Task Force

To comment on any of these issues, send email to corba-e-ftf@omg.org. (Please include the issue number in the Subject: header, thusly: [Issue ###].) To submit a new issue, send email to issues@omg.org.

List of issues (green=resolved, yellow=pending Board vote, red=unresolved)

List options: All ; Open Issues only; or Closed Issues only

Issue 10598: The use of Full Services definitions in CORBA/e spec
Issue 12512: CORBA section 11 struct PortableGroup::GroupInfo

Issue 10598: The use of Full Services definitions in CORBA/e spec (corba-e-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: Raytheon (Mr. Gerald Lee Bickle, Gerald.L.Bickle@raytheon.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity:
Summary:

Problem:

 

Since CORBA/e is for embedded constrained systems, one should be using LW Services as a minimal compliant point this would still allow one to offer up a Full Services in its offering but the other way around would not be compliant.

 

Suggested Change

The suggested change is to use LW Services definitions for CORBA/e.

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
January 19, 2007: received issue

Discussion:

Consensus was not reached on this issue in time.

Issue 12512: CORBA section 11 struct PortableGroup::GroupInfo (corba-e-ftf)

Click here for this issue's archive.
Source: PrismTech (Mr. Steve Osselton, steve.osselton@prismtechnologies.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary:

In chapter 11 'Unreliable Mulicast Inter-ORB Protocol' the struct PortableGroup::GroupInfo is discussed. However in the consolidated IDL and the IDL available from the OMG web site, this struct has been replaced by PortableGroup::TagGroupTaggedComponent. Which is correct?

Resolution:
Revised Text:
Actions taken:
May 27, 2008: received issue