Issue 10061: SysML: << and >> vs < and >                                                                                                                                                           SysML: Instance Diagrams                                                                                                                                                                                ()
Source: Lockheed Martin (Mr. Michael Jesse Chonoles, michael.j.chonoles@lmco.com mjchonoles@yahoo.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Whenever possible, the spec should use the correct symbols « and » which are easily available in Visio


Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 31, 2006: received issue
Discussion: 


End of Annotations:=====
te: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:51:51 -0400
From: "Chonoles, Michael J" <michael.j.chonoles@lmco.com>
Subject: SysML: << and >> vs < and >
To: issues@omg.org
Thread-Topic: SysML: << and >> vs < and >
Thread-Index: Aca04xiswMuj17jKTbe0PtzvOQsTHQ==
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2006 20:51:51.0433 (UTC) FILETIME=[25F99F90:01C6B4E3]


Whenever possible, the spec should use the correct symbols « and » which are easily available in Visio

 

Michael Jesse Chonoles
Principal Member of Engineer Staff 
Enterprise Architecture
Lockheed Martin Maritime Systems & Sensors (MS2)
199 Borton Landing Rd, MS 780-2A, Moorestown, NJ, 08057 
Lockheed Martin IS&S King of Prussia, PA 
michael.j.chonoles@lmco.com 
Co-author UML 2 For Dummies
OMG-Certified UML Advanced Professional 
(856) 359-1383 NJ -- Voice/Voice Mail 
(610) 644-8404 PA  -- Voice/Voice Mail 
(215) 790-2976 E-Fax 
(609) 760-2180 Mobile 
mjchonoles Skype

 



 smime20.p7s