Issue 10344: Section: 7.4.9 (ocl2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Enhancement Severity: Minor Summary: Hi, I'm reading through the latest OCL spec to get up to date before applying for a System Analyst job, I saw a possible minor issue in the list of the OCL keywords. Indeed, having read it so far, I would add the following ones but pls let me know if there is a reason why it wouldnt apply: body, derive, init, and self Resolution: Revised Text: In Section 7.4.9 add the keywords 'body', 'derive' and 'init', inserting them respecting the alphabetical order. Actions taken: September 11, 2006: received issue October 16, 2009: closed issue Discussion: 'self' is the name of a pre-defined variable and is not a keyword. However body, derive and 'init' are keywords that are used in some parts of section 7 and explicitly defined in section 9 (concrete service). So menyioning of these three keywords is missing in 7.4.9. End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 11 Sep 2006 11:36:15 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Guillaume Finance Company: None (Graduate from MSC Univ of Brighton UK looking for job) mailFrom: guillaume.finance@googlemail.com Notification: Yes Specification: OCL 2.0 Spec Section: 7.4.9 FormalNumber: ptc/2005-06-06 Version: 2.0 RevisionDate: 06/05/06 Page: 23 Nature: Enhancement Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060728 Firefox/1.5.0.6 Description Hi, I'm reading through the latest OCL spec to get up to date before applying for a System Analyst job, I saw a possible minor issue in the list of the OCL keywords. Indeed, having read it so far, I would add the following ones but pls let me know if there is a reason why it wouldnt apply: body, derive, init, and self Thanks