Issue 10389: Relations of QoS Metamol metaclasses and UML2 metaclasses (uml-qos-ft-ftf) Source: Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (Dr. Miguel A. de Miguel, mmiguel@dit.upm.es) Nature: Enhancement Severity: Significant Summary: QoS Metamodels in the FTF does not include relations of metaclasses and metaclasses in UML2. This approach allows using QoS repositories in UML2 independent environments (e.g. non-UML2 QoS-aware Modeling languages), but to do provide details about how to integrate QoS metamodels and UML2 metamodels. Relations from QoS matamodel to UML2 would provide details about the integration of both modeling languages. Resolution: Revised Text: We have updated the Figures 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, and the names of properties that are modified in models are updated in the text and in OCL constraints. On top of Page 8 we have included the new paragraph: QoS metamodels can be used to create repositories for handling QoS metadata in different kinds of tools. The metamodels that we include in this chapter include references to UML2 metamodels (merged versions of UML2 metamodel), and they can be integrated with UML2 modeling frameworks. But, if we remove these references, they have been designed to be reusable in other frameworks or modeling languages. Figure 8.2 Previous version: New version: Figure 8.3 Previous version: New version: The reference validValues was included in the metamodels of FTF but it was not visible in the figures. The profile includes this attribute. Figure 8.4 Previous version: New version: The association QoSContext-QoSConstraint is included in next figure. Figure 8.5 Previous version: New version: Figure 8.6 Previous version: New version: Actions taken: October 17, 2006: received issue April 20, 2007: closed issue Discussion: Resolution: The new model includes some inheritances and associations to UML metamodel. The inheritances allow including QoS modeling elements (e.g. QoS categories or characteristics) as contents of UML modelling elements. The associations to UML modeling elements allow navigating to UML elements related with the QoS modelling elements. In the profile, these associations are included as stereotype associations End of Annotations:===== m: "Miguel A. de Miguel" To: Subject: Issue Relations of QoS Metamol metaclasses and UML2 metaclasses Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:40:51 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Source: Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (Dr. Miguel A. de Miguel, mmiguel@dit.upm.es) Nature: Enhancement Severity: Significant Summary: QoS Metamodels in the FTF does not include relations of metaclasses and metaclasses in UML2. This approach allows using QoS repositories in UML2 independent environments (e.g. non-UML2 QoS-aware Modeling languages), but to do provide details about how to integrate QoS metamodels and UML2 metamodels. Relations from QoS matamodel to UML2 would provide details about the integration of both modeling languages.