Issue 10691: The generated class FooImpl is not mentioned in the implied idl (data-distribution-rtf)
Source: PrismTech (Mr. Erik Hendriks, erik.hendriks(at)prismtech.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: 
Summary: Problem:
In section 3.2.1.2.2 Implied IDL add directly after the definition of the Foo valuetype:

valuetype FooImpl : Foo{
	//place for application to implement application defined operations
// (operations signature known at Foo level!)
};

Solution:
TBD

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
February 12, 2007: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 10691

The generated class FooImpl is not mentioned in the implied idl

Problem:
In section 3.2.1.2.2 Implied IDL add directly after the definition of the Foo valuetype:

valuetype FooImpl : Foo{
	//place for application to implement application defined operations
// (operations signature known at Foo level!)
};

Solution:
TBD