Issue 10781: Section: 10.3.4 of formal/2007-02-03 (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Revision Severity: Minor Summary: The direction of deployment dependency is wrong in all figures that use this kind of dependency, e.g. figure 10.9 on page 216 (direction is opposite to the one stated in metamodel). The deployment dependency in these figures is being drawn from artifact (client) to target (suplier), though figure 10.4 on page 210 defines Deployment as being dependency with DeploymentTarget as client and DeployedArtifact as supplier, so direction should be opposite - from target to artifact. As an alternative, the metamodel could be adjusted. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: February 19, 2007: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 19 Feb 2007 11:44:16 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Donatas Ciuksys Company: Vilnius University, Lithuania mailFrom: donatas.ciuksys@mif.vu.lt Notification: Yes Specification: Donatas Ciuksys Section: 10.3.4 FormalNumber: formal/2007-02-03 Version: 2.1.1 RevisionDate: 02/03/2007 Page: 216 Nature: Revision Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1 Description The direction of deployment dependency is wrong in all figures that use this kind of dependency, e.g. figure 10.9 on page 216 (direction is opposite to the one stated in metamodel). The deployment dependency in these figures is being drawn from artifact (client) to target (suplier), though figure 10.4 on page 210 defines Deployment as being dependency with DeploymentTarget as client and DeployedArtifact as supplier, so direction should be opposite - from target to artifact. As an alternative, the metamodel could be adjusted.