Issue 10842: Section 8.2 wording (odm-ftf) Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Section 8.2 wording. In Section 8.2 (Why Not Simply Use or Extend the UML 2.0 Metamodel?), next to last paragraph, first sentence, remove "Additionally". The paragraph is about a similarity between UML and OWL, rather than a difference as the earlier paragraphs were. Resolution: Replace text as indicated. Revised Text: 1. In Chapter 8, section 8.2 "Why Not Simply Use or Extend the UML 2.0 Metamodel?," next to last paragraph, revise the first sentence to read: While some claim that UML would need to support properties independently of classes to be used in the OWL style, this is not actually the case. Actions taken: March 30, 2007: received issue January 15, 2008: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 30 Mar 2007 00:47:24 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Conrad Bock Company: NIST mailFrom: conrad.bock@nist.giv Notification: No Specification: Ontology Definition Metamodel Section: FormalNumber: ptc/06-10-11 Version: RevisionDate: Page: Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) Description Section 8.2 wording. In Section 8.2 (Why Not Simply Use or Extend the UML 2.0 Metamodel?), next to last paragraph, first sentence, remove "Additionally". The paragraph is about a similarity between UML and OWL, rather than a difference as the earlier paragraphs were.