Issue 10847: Chapter 16 purpose (odm-ftf) Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov) Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant Summary: Chapter 16 purpose. In Chapter 16 (Mapping UML to OWL), first sentence, starting with "in part" says the chapter is trying to justify using ODM rather than UML. This of course is not the point of a comparison, which is to be informative and let readers make their own choices, including the option to use both with mappings. Resolution: Replace the entire first sentence of 16.1 Introduction as described below. Revised Text: 1. Replace first sentence with: This chapter intends to provide an informative comparison between UML and the ontology representation language OWL. Actions taken: March 30, 2007: received issue January 15, 2008: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 30 Mar 2007 00:49:32 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Conrad Bock Company: NIST mailFrom: conrad.bock@nist.giv Notification: No Specification: Ontology Definition Metamodel Section: FormalNumber: ptc/06-10-11 Version: RevisionDate: Page: Nature: Clarification Severity: Significant HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) Description Chapter 16 purpose. In Chapter 16 (Mapping UML to OWL), first sentence, starting with "in part" says the chapter is trying to justify using ODM rather than UML. This of course is not the point of a comparison, which is to be informative and let readers make their own choices, including the option to use both with mappings.