Issue 10900: UML to OWL, OWL-DL (odm-rtf)
Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Critical
Summary: UML to OWL, OWL-DL. Section 16.3 (UML to OWL), third sentence, says the mapping is only to OWL-DL. Why not OWL Full? 

Resolution: Replace text as described below.
Revised Text: Replace the text in the third sentence of first paragraph in section 16.3 which currently reads:
The mapping is limited to OWL DL, which means only OWL-DL constructs will be used in mapping definitions.
with
This mapping is limited to OWL DL, which means only OWL-DL constructs will be used in mapping definitions.

Actions taken:
March 30, 2007: received issue
April 25, 2014: closed issue
Discussion: 
FTF resources were scarce and priority was given to issues against normative sections, hence many issues such as this were left unresolved.

Disposition:	Deferred to RTF

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 30 Mar 2007 01:11:36 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Conrad Bock
Company: NIST
mailFrom: conrad.bock@nist.giv
Notification: No
Specification: Ontology Definition Metamodel
Section: Chapter 16
FormalNumber: ptc/06-10-11
Version: 
RevisionDate: 
Page: 
Nature: Revision
Severity: Critical
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
Description
UML to OWL, OWL-DL. Section 16.3 (UML to OWL), third sentence, says the mapping is only to OWL-DL. Why not OWL Full?