Issue 10995: DDS DLRL Issue: Clarification on the use of a Set in a DLRL Query (data-distribution-rtf) Source: OCI (Mr. Donald Busch, busch_d(at)ociweb.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: In a DLRL Query, there are [] operators to access members of a collection. For a Set, is the [] operator used to determine whether the value is in the set or not? Or does a "contains" operator need to be added to the query language? Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: May 9, 2007: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== il-OSG: N8Z407kVM1k9n1ABYJ1R22c6mZY8uVYkU3zvx9rnj8DENVHSsy6j.YhAtAH_d5o9zJvT7ZI2cErg2PcbKwRmWrDVbhoNzjWne24iqFqo6_anszWQk9o- Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 13:35:27 -0500 From: Don Busch User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) To: issues@omg.org Subject: DDS DLRL Issue: Clarification on the use of a Set in a DLRL Query In a DLRL Query, there are [] operators to access members of a collection. For a Set, is the [] operator used to determine whether the value is in the set or not? Or does a "contains" operator need to be added to the query language? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Don Busch, Principal Software Engineer and Partner Object Computing, Inc. (OCI) http://www.ociweb.com http://www.theaceorb.com http://jacorb.ociweb.com "Never let what you can't do get in the way of what you can do." - John Wooden ---------------------------------------------------------------- smime14.p7s