Issue 11115: Section: 7.3.21 (uml2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: Inconsistancy between background fill colouring. Default colour preferences are normally white background, black text, and this issue is then not visible. Changing to a custom colouring to green backgrond, black text, one sees that that some boxes are filled white, whereas others are the same as the selected background colour. Is this intentional? Does this have any semantic meaning? Example in Figure 7.47 (b) Power type notation. The PowerType classifiers use the page background
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 3, 2007: received issue
Discussion: 


End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 03 Jul 2007 07:39:50 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: jonathan tanner
Company: myself
mailFrom: 2007@bigtoe.demon.co.uk
Notification: Yes
Specification: uml superstructure
Section: 7.3.21
FormalNumber: formal/07-02-05
Version: 2.1.1
RevisionDate: 02/05/2007
Page: 94
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
Description
Inconsistancy between background fill colouring. Default colour preferences are normally white background, black text, and this issue is then not visible. Changing to a custom colouring to green backgrond, black text, one sees that that some boxes are filled white, whereas others are the same as the selected background colour. Is this intentional? Does this have any semantic meaning? Example in Figure 7.47 (b) Power type notation. The PowerType classifiers use the page background.