Issue 115: CORBA_BOA_set_exception() parameter issues (c_mapping-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Uncategorized Severity: Summary: Summary: Who owns the parameters "exceptname" and "param" to CORBA_BOA_set_exception? Shouldn"t that routine take a second CORBA_Environment parameter to signal errors in its operation? Resolution: POA update eliminated conditions - close Revised Text: Actions taken: September 11, 1996: Received issue December 12, 1996: moved from cxx_revision to c-rev-wg October 5, 2000: closed issue Discussion: The sections on the POA have replaced the text related to the BOA and the POA text has no equivalent text. End of Annotations:===== From geoff Wed Sep 11 13:56:45 1996 Received: by amethyst.omg.org.omg.org (5.4R2.01/1.34) id AA06009; Wed, 11 Sep 1996 13:56:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 13:56:45 -0400 From: geoff (Geoffrey Speare) Message-Id: <9609111756.AA06009@amethyst.omg.org.omg.org> To: issue-logger@omg.org Subject: C mapping: CORBA_BOA_set_exception() parameter issues X-Omg-Issue: 115 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 17:31:24 PDT Sender: Bill Janssen From: Bill Janssen To: issues@omg.org Subject: C mapping: CORBA_BOA_set_exception() parameter issues Cc: orbos@omg.org Who owns the parameters ``exceptname'' and ``param'' to CORBA_BOA_set_exception? Shouldn't that routine take a second CORBA_Environment parameter as the last parameter to signal errors in its operation? Bill Issue 115: CORBA_BOA_set_exception() parameter issues Summary: Who owns the parameters "exceptname" and "param" to CORBA_BOA_set_exception? Shouldn"t that routine take a second CORBA_Environment parameter to signal errors in its operation? Discussion - The sections on the POA have replaced the text related to the BOA and the POA text has no equivalent text. (Its not related to this issue but a related question occurs. Since the BOA functions are no longer in the language mapping, does it mean that upward compatibility need not be supported? How has this been handled by other language mappings?) I propose that we close the issue.