Issue 11653: Section: 5.3 (sysml-rtf) Source: (Mr. Sanford A. Friedenthal, ) Nature: Enhancement Severity: Significant Summary: SysML needs the capability to interchange diagrams in addition to model data. The concrete syntax complliance should include a requirement to comply with diagram interchange in a similar way that the infrastructure specifciation does. The following is included in section 2.3 of the Infrastructure Spec under Concrete Syntax Compliance: - the ability to output diagrams and to read in diagrams based on the XMI schema defined by the Diagram Interchange specification for notation at that level. This option requires abstract syntax and concrete syntax compliance. The proposal is to add the same requirement as above to section 5.3 as a second bullet under the concrete syntax compliance. Resolution: Defer Postponed to the next RTF Revised Text: Actions taken: November 19, 2007: received issue January 3, 2017: Deferred April 6, 2017: closed issue Discussion: Diagram interchange is strongly desirable but is not yet supported among current tools. A new "Diagram Definition RFP" issued by OMG could offer additional support for concrete syntax compliance including interchange. Diagram compliance issues can be considered in future updates of the specification. Disposition: Deferred Discussion: This issue was previously deferred by the SysML 1.1 RTF, which noted: Diagram interchange is strongly desirable but is not yet supported among current tools. A new “Diagram Definition RFP” issued by OMG could offer additional support for concrete syntax compliance including interchange. Diagram compliance issues can be considered in future updates of the specification. Submission and adoption are still in progress for the Diagram Definition RFP. New forms of support for diagram definition and interchange may be adopted by OMG as a result of this process. The addition of diagram interchange compliance to SysML should be reassessed once these future directions become clear. Additional compliance points for diagram syntax and interchange could be added by either a future RTF or RFP submission process. Disposition: Deferred End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 19 Nov 2007 09:50:23 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Sanford Friedenthal Company: Lockheed Martin mailFrom: sanford.friedenthal@lmco.com Notification: Yes Specification: OMG SysML Section: 5.3 FormalNumber: formal/2007-09-01 Version: 1.0 RevisionDate: 09/30/2007 Page: 15 Nature: Enhancement Severity: Significant HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727) Description SysML needs the capability to interchange diagrams in addition to model data. The concrete syntax complliance should include a requirement to comply with diagram interchange in a similar way that the infrastructure specifciation does. The following is included in section 2.3 of the Infrastructure Spec under Concrete Syntax Compliance: - the ability to output diagrams and to read in diagrams based on the XMI schema defined by the Diagram Interchange specification for notation at that level. This option requires abstract syntax and concrete syntax compliance. The proposal is to add the same requirement as above to section 5.3 as a second bullet under the concrete syntax compliance. Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 12:37:30 -0500 From: "Friedenthal, Sanford" Subject: SysML RTF Issue 11653 - Diagram Interchange Compliance Point To: sysml-rtf@omg.org Cc: Burkhart Roger M Thread-Topic: SysML RTF Issue 11653 - Diagram Interchange Compliance Point Thread-Index: Achmi16c0SJOMHblQVivvLEfqg9XJg== X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2008 17:37:30.0792 (UTC) FILETIME=[73B70280:01C8668B] SysML RTF participants One of the issues I raised is whether we should add Diagram Interchange as a compliance point for SysML as indicated in Issue 11653 below. What are the thoughts on this from the perspective of both tool vendors and end users. Is this worth doing at this time? If so, does it make sense to add the compliance statement similar to what is in the UML Infrastructure spec as indicated below? Alternatively, we can defer until we feel diagram interchange has more teeth. All thoughts are welcome. I would like to add a proposed resolution to the next SysML RTF ballot. Sandy Sanford Friedenthal Lockheed Martin (703) 293-5557 Issue 11653: Section: 5.3 (sysml-rtf) Click here for this issue's archive. Source: Lockheed Martin (Mr. Sanford A. Friedenthal, sanford.friedenthal@lmco.com) Nature: Enhancement Severity: Significant Summary: SysML needs the capability to interchange diagrams in addition to model data. The concrete syntax compliance should include a requirement to comply with diagram interchange in a similar way that the infrastructure specification does. The following is included in section 2.3 of the Infrastructure Spec under Concrete Syntax Compliance: - the ability to output diagrams and to read in diagrams based on the XMI schema defined by the Diagram Interchange specification for notation at that level. This option requires abstract syntax and concrete syntax compliance. The proposal is to add the same requirement as above to section 5.3 as a second bullet under the concrete syntax compliance. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: November 19, 2007: received issue Sanford Friedenthal Lockheed Martin (703) 293-5557