Issue 11860: In section 2.4.2, the list of extension units and table 7.2 are redundant (marte-ftf)
Source: THALES (Mr. Sebastien Demathieu, sebastien.demathieu(at)thalesgroup.com)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
Summary: In section 2.4.2, the list of extension units and the table 7.2 are redundant. I would suggest removing the list of extension units
Resolution: I agree on the redundancy, but I propose to keep the table instead of the text.
Revised Text: In section2.4.2, replace the text:

"
The Extension Units that must be supported in each Compliance Cases are assigned in the following way:
o Software Modeling
o Base: RTM, GRM, NFP, ETM
o Full: SRM, ECM, ALM, VSL, CHF
o Hardware Modeling
o Base: HRM, GRM, NFP, ETM
o Full: ECM, ALM, VSL, CHF, RSM
o System Architecting
o Base: RTM, HRM, GRM, NFP, ETM
o Full: SRM, ECM, ALM, VSL, CHF, RSM
o Performance Analysis
o Base: PAM, GAM, GRM, NFP, ETM
o Full: VSL, CHF
o Schedulability Analysis
o Base: SAM, GAM, GRM, NFP, ETM
o Full: VSL, CHF
o Infrastructure Providing
o Base: SRM, GRM, ETM, NFP,
o Full: RTM, VSL, ALM, CHF
o Methodologist
o Base: : RTM, HRM, GRM, NFP, ETM, GAM
o Full: MARTE (ECM, ALM, SRM, PAM, SAM, VSL, CHF, RSM)
This is summarized in the table below.
"

By

"The Extension Units that must be supported in each Compliance Cases are assigned as depicted in the following table."

Actions taken:
December 21, 2007: received issue
February 17, 2010: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 21 Dec 2007 13:13:24 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Sébastien Demathieu
Company: Thales
mailFrom: sebastien.demathieu@thalesgroup.com
Notification: Yes
Specification: UML profile for MARTE
Section: 2
FormalNumber: 07-08-04
Version: Beta 1
RevisionDate: 08/2007
Page: 2
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11
Description
In section 2.4.2, the list of extension units and the table 7.2 are redundant. I would suggest removing the list of extension units.

Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:12:55 +0100
From: Sébastien Demathieu <sebastien.demathieu@thalesgroup.com>
Organization: Thales Research & Technology
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
To: GERARD Sebastien 166342 <Sebastien.GERARD@cea.fr>
Cc: marte-ftf@omg.org
Subject: Re: MARTE RTF: General WG


Thanks Séb. 

In issues 11858, 11859, 11860, there are references to "CHF" (for Annex C, I suppose). I am not sure this term
is defined anywhere in the document. On the other hand, CVS and CCSL defined in Annex C are referenced in
other places of the spec.

In the extension unit table, could we replace "CHF" by "CVS, CCSL" ?

Thanks,

Sébastien



GERARD Sebastien 166342 a écrit : 
Hi all,

 

I have almost dealt with all issues assigned for the General WG and included in the ballot 1. It was only editorial issues: http://www.omgwiki.org/marte/doku.php?id=general_wg:start

 

 

Cheers,

Séb

 

 

---------------------------------------------

Dr. Sébastien Gérard

 

Head of the Accord-UML research project

CEA LIST/LISE

Boîte courrier 65, GIF SUR YVETTE

CEDEX, F-91191 France

Phone/fax : +33 1 69 08 58 24 / 83 95

Open source UML2 Eclipse plug-in: www.papyrusuml.org

 

Before printing, think about the environment