Issue 1240:  bom/98-02-17 B (boca-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Clarification
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: BOCA
 The BOCA errata  document dated April 1, 1998 was intended to be an
 extension of the BOCA 1.1 Errata document bom/98-02-17, with revisions
 made in response to requests by the AB, and others, in the few days
 prior to April 1.    Unfortunately, there was a transcription error and
 some of the items contained in bom/98-02-17 were not included in the
 final errata.     Most of these items are typographical errors,
 inconsistencies, redundancies, or alignment considerations with the BOCA
 Interoperability Framework.    Those items which are in these categories
 follow, and I assume are not controversial.   There were a few items
 which may materially impact the specification - these will be
 re-introduced as separate issues. 
 

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 27, 1998: received issue
June 23, 1998: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Return-Path: <tom-d@dataaccess.com>
From: Tom Digre <tom-d@dataaccess.com>
To: "'issues'" <issues@omg.org>
Cc: "'Boca RTF'" <boca-rtf@omg.org>
Subject: boca-rtf issue: bom/98-02-17 BOCA 1.1 Errata Transcription
error
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 09:59:55 -0400

BOCA
The BOCA errata  document dated April 1, 1998 was intended to be an
extension of the BOCA 1.1 Errata document bom/98-02-17, with revisions
made in response to requests by the AB, and others, in the few days
prior to April 1.    Unfortunately, there was a transcription error
and
some of the items contained in bom/98-02-17 were not included in the
final errata.     Most of these items are typographical errors,
inconsistencies, redundancies, or alignment considerations with the
BOCA
Interoperability Framework.    Those items which are in these
categories
follow, and I assume are not controversial.   There were a few items
which may materially impact the specification - these will be
re-introduced as separate issues. 

The following items were in bom/98-02-17 but not in the final errata:

*	page 31
	*	reference text:	"A process is "launched" relative to
the
component it is defined in. The names and types of processes that can
be
launched from each type of component are known to the enclosing
component and used to bind to the correct Process Object.  The BOCA
concept of process does not assume anything about it's implementation
-
such as it being part of a workflow system or implemented in "code".
"
	*	action:   Removed
	*	rationale: More of a framework concept.	
*	page 162
	*	reference text:  Under "<type::keyword>"	
	*	action: Add "business_event"	
	*	rationale:  Unintentionally missing	
*	page 164
	*	reference text:	Under "<Feature::visibility>"	
	*	action: Add "LOCAL"	
	*	rationale: Unintentionally missing	
*	page 165
	*	reference text:	"FIRST_COMMIT"	
	*	action:  change to "INITIALIZED"
	*	rationale:  Old keyword	
*	page 169
	*	reference text:	"IsIn"
	*	action: change to	"IsPartOf"
	*	rationale:	Old keyword	
*	page 169
	*	reference text:	"IsUsedBy" and "Adapts"
	*	action:	Remove	
	*	ratioale: Old keywords	
*	pages 83, 84, 91
	*	reference text:	"ECA"
	*	action: replace with "BOCA"
	*	rationale:	Old Word	
*	page 312
	*	reference text:	"component"
	*	action: replace with "dependent"
	*	rationale:	Old keyword	
*	pages 302, 314
	*	reference text:	"component"
	*	action: replace with "type"
	*	rational:	Old keyword	

RECOMMENDATION:
Reinstate these omitted Errata items. 

Tom Digre