Issue 12440: Section: A/1.1.5 Associations (ocl2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Revision Severity: Minor Summary: The next to last line of Definition A.4 begins, "that associates (sa) = <oc, c>." I think this should read instead, "that associates (sa) = <c, c>." If I am mistaken, then a note to remind the reader what "oc" means would be helpful, as would a note describing why the classes are not the same. Resolution: Revised Text: In Section A/1.1.5 Associations replace " that associates (sa) = <oc, c>." by " that associates (sa) = <c, c>." Actions taken: May 13, 2008: received issue October 16, 2009: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 13 May 2008 13:16:24 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Garr Lystad Company: Net.Orange (i.e. Net Dot Orange) mailFrom: glystad@ndorange.com Notification: Yes Specification: Object Constraint Language Section: A/1.1.5 Associations FormalNumber: n/a Version: 2.0 RevisionDate: 1 May 2006 Page: 179 Nature: Revision Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14 Description The next to last line of Definition A.4 begins, "that associates (sa) = .oc, c.." I think this should read instead, "that associates (sa) = .c, c.." If I am mistaken, then a note to remind the reader what "oc" means would be helpful, as would a note describing why the classes are not the same.