Issue 12481: RecordFile and Datatypes (kdm-rtf) Source: KDM Analytics (Dr. Nikolai Mansourov, nick(at)kdmanalytics.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Currently RecordFile in DataModel owns ItemUnits. We are missing a RecordType, so that we can define a StorableUnit, corresponding to a record, and use that RecordType for the Type attribute of that StorableUnit. We need the StorableUnit for Addresses, etc. It is important that the RecordFile owns the RecordType, because we want to have associations going to the RecordFile whenever its fields are used in the code. Suggested resolution: generalize owned elements from ItemUnit to CodeItem. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: May 15, 2008: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: "Nikolai Mansourov" To: , Cc: , "'Alain Picard'" Subject: KDM issues to be considered in KDM 1.1.1 Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 10:26:28 -0400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: Aci2l6ndub9LUbwqTXOOoaKcuht7rw== X-Authenticated: nickmansurov - ottawa-hs-64-26-169-119.s-ip.magma.ca (MERGANSER) [64.26.169.119] Hello everyone, Here are several issues that came up recently by two implementation projects. These issues affect several ongoing implementation projects, therefore I suggest treating them as urgent and resolving as part of KDM 1.1.1 RecordFile and Datatypes. Currently RecordFile in DataModel owns ItemUnits. We are missing a RecordType, so that we can define a StorableUnit, corresponding to a record, and use that RecordType for the Type attribute of that StorableUnit. We need the StorableUnit for Addresses, etc. It is important that the RecordFile owns the RecordType, because we want to have associations going to the RecordFile whenever its fields are used in the code. Suggested resolution: generalize owned elements from ItemUnit to CodeItem.