Issue 12849: fact type 'fact type form incorporates fact symbol' needs additional captio (sbvr-rtf) Source: Business Rule Solutions, LLC (Ms. Keri Anderson Healy, keri_ah(at)mac.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: p. 150 (PDF p. 162), Clause 11.2.1.2, to the entry for 'fact type form incorporates fact symbol': Add the following caption, to appear after the current Synonymous Form caption: Synonymous Form: fact type form demonstrates designation using term styling where underlined (above) and verb styling for italics (above) Also, on this same page, there is a typo in the Definition caption under the entry for 'fact symbol': In 'fact type form' (which ends the Definition) the first space needs to be underlined — i.e., apply term styling to the space. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: September 11, 2008: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== uthority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ZFI9rLSsaWAA:10 a=FgIwNgqibgIA:10 a=hIvji-7admzMTefiQ14A:9 a=P7YIvAT4uJWx3DTTwgtbVEupVSYA:4 a=eZpzce9S0DEA:10 a=zDeWOl4wo3ViDEIY6AgA:9 a=rQTKWk8T4whxiHWW9UEA:7 a=q9aTO_zZbHqZ52QhgICTl4fOgxEA:4 a=Sz-0p1zU2dQA:10 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:16:56 -0700 Subject: issue: fact type 'fact type form incorporates fact symbol' needs additional caption From: keri To: SBVR RTF , Juergen Boldt Thread-Topic: issue: fact type 'fact type form incorporates fact symbol' needs additional caption Thread-Index: AckUIW16q8hYOoAUEd2RowARJM+Cgg== p. 150 (PDF p. 162), Clause 11.2.1.2, to the entry for 'fact type form incorporates fact symbol': Add the following caption, to appear after the current Synonymous Form caption: Synonymous Form: fact type form demonstrates designation using term styling where underlined (above) and verb styling for italics (above) Also, on this same page, there is a typo in the Definition caption under the entry for 'fact symbol': In 'fact type form' (which ends the Definition) the first space needs to be underlined . i.e., apply term styling to the space. DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Organization:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To; b=xiDQ8Y6TjdcgcabfTjpLYscxCbRdauf7JMzpRkDcXG+8l+gPdtGppkW6zosMjBdjyiYdhAprJqBV8MopOzCRVMeFLN1HMjTF43eugevcL6XxXK7bkYp8DjZo0AdwCrI9VZ+Exd3JTLn6rdpwRlgvE5XxvMC56W2sFE+DjEbHyn0= ; X-YMail-OSG: K44v7a8VM1ncmyzUwxzfKWgPIa7fda1wddXBbL1nYK7.KLnyImt8l7RM6FEVPjaxps8FnqEzG5v2Vc30zccHGkNXkr62MQ8dH16XqLxOZnqVXdbcJ9vlHgia5ODw3QFvG8v7wyQbaaLfXVygQ_6FUga3kLhShF23k2pk.Gngw4GizltstzfgQBNCUuM- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Reply-To: From: "Donald Chapin" To: "'SBVR RTF'" Subject: RE: issue 12849 -- SBVR RTF issue -- Discussion Points for SBVR RTF Face to Face Meeting Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 14:48:03 -0800 Organization: Business Semantics Ltd X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AckU5wAxPp/4EoDaEd2ZDgARJM+CghGJk4PA All . Some points that need to be discussed in tomorrow.s meeting to achieve clarity in support of this proposed resolution of Issue 12849: 1. Regarding .fact type form demonstrates designation. and .fact type form incorporates fact symbol.: a. What is the intended meaning (definition) of the verb demonstrates in this fact type and how does it relate to the meaning of incorporates in .fact type form incorporates fact symbol.? b. Is it any/all kind(s) of designation (i.e. placeholder, term, name, icon, fact type role designation, fact symbol) that is(are) demonstrated / incorporated or is it just fact symbol that is demonstrated / incorporated? c. What is demonstrated / incorporated: the designation / fact symbol, or the expression playing the role in the fact type .expression designates concept. that designation objectifies and that is a subcategory fact type of .expression represents meaning.? 2. Regarding designation (as used in .fact type form demonstrates designation.) / fact symbol: a. What kind of meaning are they designations of? b. Do the expressions that they use include empty placeholder makers or not; e.g. in third example under fact type form is the expression used by the designation / fact symbol .charges on. or .. charges . on ..? i. If not, how is the expression of the designation / fact symbol related to the expression of the fact type form that demonstrates / incorporates them? c. How is an empty placeholder / the placeholder itself (that which designates the fact type role) distinguished from the that which goes into the empty placeholder / takes it place in the placeholder itself (that which designates the object type that the role ranges over)? i. Does the definition of placeholder make this clear? d. Do the definitions of fact symbol, .fact type form demonstrates designation., .fact type form incorporates fact symbol. make it clear how the expression of the designation / fact symbol is related to the expression of the fact type form that demonstrates / incorporates them? Donald -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: keri [mailto:keri_ah@mac.com] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 7:51 AM To: SBVR RTF; Donald R. Chapin Subject: Re: issue 12849 -- SBVR RTF issue Donald, Thanks for the template. Attached is the requested write-up. Please let me know if it needs anything else. Regards, Keri On 9/11/08 8:25 AM, "Juergen Boldt" wrote: p. 150 (PDF p. 162), Clause 11.2.1.2, to the entry for 'fact type form incorporates fact symbol': Add the following caption, to appear after the current Synonymous Form caption: Synonymous Form: fact type form demonstrates designation using term styling where underlined (above) and verb styling for italics (above) Also, on this same page, there is a typo in the Definition caption under the entry for 'fact symbol': In 'fact type form' (which ends the Definition) the first space needs to be underlined . i.e., apply term styling to the space. Keri Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services Object Management Group 140 Kendrick St Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA tel: +1 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 781 444 0320 email: juergen@omg.org www.omg.org Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:50:52 -0400 From: "Edward J. Barkmeyer" To: sbvr-rtf@omg.org Subject: Issue 12849 proposed resolution from December meeting User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 X-NIST-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-NIST-MailScanner-From: edbark@nist.gov -- Edward J. Barkmeyer Manufacturing Systems Integration Division National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive M/S 8263 email: edbark@nist.gov Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263 tel: +1-301-975-3528 SBVR Issue 12849-rev.doc From: Don Baisley To: "Edward J. Barkmeyer" , "sbvr-rtf@omg.org" Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:29:18 -0700 Subject: RE: Issue 12849 proposed resolution from December meeting Thread-Topic: Issue 12849 proposed resolution from December meeting Thread-Index: AcmuKy19PHLXr/NaTBmUdH9N+R4oswByAglA Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US I agree with all of Ed's changes to the proposed resolution. In the attached document I fixed a little formatting and fixed the definition of 'fact symbol' to be fully formal. I noticed that the Summary section does not match the original issue statement. Should it? Best regards, Don -----Original Message----- From: Edward J. Barkmeyer [mailto:edbark@nist.gov] Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:51 AM To: sbvr-rtf@omg.org Subject: Issue 12849 proposed resolution from December meeting -- Edward J. Barkmeyer Manufacturing Systems Integration Division National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive M/S 8263 email: edbark@nist.gov Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263 tel: +1-301-975-3528 Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:46:58 -0400 From: Ed Barkmeyer Reply-To: edbark@nist.gov Organization: NIST User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) To: SBVR RTF Subject: Re: SBVR Issue 12849 proposed resolution from December meeting X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@mel.nist.gov for more information X-NISTMEL-MailScanner-ID: n2VGl3sf030375 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-MailScanner-From: edbark@nist.gov X-MailScanner-Watermark: 1239122824.93608@zwVsdZhxabMoHreplvlwVQ X-Spam-Status: No One more time: This is only reformatted to be clear in its directions to the editor. I made no substantive changes to the revision text per Don. -Ed -- Edward J. Barkmeyer Email: edbark@nist.gov National Institute of Standards & Technology Manufacturing Systems Integration Division 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263 Tel: +1 301-975-3528 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263 FAX: +1 301-975-4694 Keri