Issue 12852: issue to address how problem 11240 was actually addressed in UML 2.2 spec (uml2-rtf)
Source: International Business Machines (Mr. James Bruck, nobody)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary:  believe we need to raise a new issue to address how problem 11240 was actually addressed in the UML 2.2 spec. 

If I'm not mistaken, the fix for issue 11240 should involve redefining TemplateParameter::default and constraining the type to Classifier.    However, all that was actually done to address the problem was to remove the offending (redundant) "defaultClassifier" property.    The original issue: http://www.omg.org/issues/uml2-rtf.html#Issue11240 ,  makes mention of the redefinition. 

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 11, 2008: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
ubject: Issue with UML 2.2 spec.
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 August 18, 2005
From: James Bruck <jbruck@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:13:14 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D25ML03/25/M/IBM(Release 7.0.3FP1|February 24, 2008) at
 09/11/2008 16:13:15,
        Serialize complete at 09/11/2008 16:13:15



Hi Juergen 

I believe we need to raise a new issue to address how problem 11240 was actually addressed in the UML 2.2 spec. 

If I'm not mistaken, the fix for issue 11240 should involve redefining TemplateParameter::default and constraining the type to Classifier.    However, all that was actually done to address the problem was to remove the offending (redundant) "defaultClassifier" property.    The original issue: http://www.omg.org/issues/uml2-rtf.html#Issue11240 ,  makes mention of the redefinition. 


Cheers, 

- James.