Issue 12866: Inconsistency in the description of ConceptualRelations diagram (kdm-rtf) Source: KDM Analytics (Dr. Nikolai Mansourov, nick(at)kdmanalytics.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: In the ConceptualRelations Class Diagram in the KDM specification (see page 269) indicates that ConceptualFlow class has two associations socalled ‘to’ and ‘from’ on ConceptualContainer class. However in the section that explains the associations (in same page) indicates that they are ‘to’ and ‘from’ associations that have AbstractConceptualElement type (superclass of ConceptualContainer class). ” Resolution: deferred to next RTF Revised Text: Actions taken: September 26, 2008: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: "Nikolai Mansourov" To: "'Juergen Boldt'" Cc: "'RICARDO PEREZ DEL CASTILLO'" Subject: KDM issue Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:24:27 -0400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: Ackf6/aoP/1Tn9bCTqKsEKGRh+YxDw== X-Authenticated: nickmansurov - (MERGANSER) [66.90.4.10] Dear Juergen, I am forwarding you an issue raised by Mr. Ricardo Perez Del Castillo from University of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). Can you please enter it to the KDM RTF repository. Specification KDM 1.1 Issue: Inconsistency in the description of ConceptualRelations diagram . In the ConceptualRelations Class Diagram in the KDM specification (see page 269) indicates that ConceptualFlow class has two associations socalled .to. and .from. on ConceptualContainer class. However in the section that explains the associations (in same page) indicates that they are .to. and .from. associations that have AbstractConceptualElement type (superclass of ConceptualContainer class). . Best regards, Nikolai Mansourov Chief Technology Officer KDM Analytics cell (613) 276-2323 www.kdmanalytics.com e-mail: nick@kdmanalytics.com