Issue 13053: Aggregations/Associations in DCPS PSM: (amsm-rtf) Source: THALES (Mr. Willy Boenink, willy.boenink(at)nl.thalesgroup.com) Nature: Enhancement Severity: Significant Summary: Aggregations/Associations in DCPS PSM: The mapping of aggregations and associations from the PIM model to the DCPS PSM are not always practical. Due to some mapping rules, references are defined more than once, causing potential inconsistencies (e.g. sequence of relations in one topic with Owner reference in the addressed topic). Rules sometimes disable query opportunities (e.g. use of sequences and unions). The DCPS PSM preferably should do without sequences and unions, and redundant information Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: October 31, 2008: received issue April 30, 2009: deferred Discussion: Too much work, too late. Besides, this not an impediment for implementation. DEFERRED. March 2010: Will be addressed in the following RTF period. End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 31 Oct 2008 08:31:46 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Willy Boenink Company: Thales Nederland mailFrom: willy.boenink@nl.thalesgroup.com Notification: No Specification: AMSM Section: 11.1.1.5.1 FormalNumber: dtc/2008-02-02 Version: Beta 2 RevisionDate: 02/02/2008 Page: 277 Nature: Enhancement Severity: Significant HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008051206 Firefox/3.0 Description Aggregations/Associations in DCPS PSM: The mapping of aggregations and associations from the PIM model to the DCPS PSM are not always practical. Due to some mapping rules, references are defined more than once, causing potential inconsistencies (e.g. sequence of relations in one topic with Owner reference in the addressed topic). Rules sometimes disable query opportunities (e.g. use of sequences and unions). The DCPS PSM preferably should do without sequences and unions, and redundant information.