Issue 13223: explanation of the operation: 'List(T)::insertAt(T,int) (qvt-rtf)
Source: Open Canarias, SL (Mr. E. Victor Sanchez, vsanchez(at)opencanarias.com)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
Summary: The explanation of the operation: 'List(T)::insertAt(T,int) : Void' in Section 8.3.8.3 has a mistake concerning the index associated with the first element for OCL collections. The index starts at one, '1', not zero, '0'. Suggestion: Substitute the word 'zero' by the word 'one', so that the text reads: "The index starts at one (in compliance with OCL convention)." 

Resolution: Yes. Improved wording in Issue 19146.
Disposition: See issue 19146 for disposition
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
January 13, 2009: received issue
July 15, 2014: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 13 Jan 2009 07:08:36 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Victor Sanchez
Company: Open Canarias S.L.
mailFrom: vsanchez@opencanarias.com
Notification: Yes
Specification: MOF QVT
Section: 8.3.8.3
FormalNumber: formal/2008-04-03 
Version: 1.0
RevisionDate: 04/03/2008
Page: 114
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008121621 Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/3.0.5
Description
The explanation of the operation: 'List(T)::insertAt(T,int) : Void' in Section 8.3.8.3 has a mistake concerning the index associated with the first element for OCL collections. The index starts at one, '1', not zero, '0'. Suggestion: Substitute the word 'zero' by the word 'one', so that the text reads: "The index starts at one (in compliance with OCL convention)."