Issue 13315: Issue: Bug in ReclassifyObjectActionActivation::doAction (fuml-ftf) Source: Model Driven Solutions (Mr. Ed Seidewitz, ed-s(at)modeldriven.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Specification: Semantics of a Foundation Subset for Executable UML Models, FTF – Beta 1 (ptc/08-11-03) Section: 8.6.4.2.5 (ReclassifyObjectActionActivation) Summary: In ReclassifyObjectActionActivation::doAction, there is a for loop with loop variable “n”. However, the loop test uses “i” instead of “n”. Proposed resolution: Replace: for (int n = 0; i < newClassifiers.size(); n++) { with: for (int n = 0; n < newClassifiers.size(); n++) { Resolution: Change the code as proposed. Revised Text: In ReclassifyObjectActionActivation::doAction, replace: for (int n = 0; i < newClassifiers.size(); n++) { with: for (int n = 0; n < newClassifiers.size(); n++) { Actions taken: January 21, 2009: received issue July 23, 2010: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== ubject: Issue: Bug in ReclassifyObjectActionActivation::doAction Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:09:53 -0500 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Issue: Bug in ReclassifyObjectActionActivation::doAction thread-index: Acl7VDOJ3LahV7IgQcC+otXsnl2uHA== From: "Ed Seidewitz" To: Specification: Semantics of a Foundation Subset for Executable UML Models, FTF . Beta 1 (ptc/08-11-03) Section: 8.6.4.2.5 (ReclassifyObjectActionActivation) Summary: In ReclassifyObjectActionActivation::doAction, there is a for loop with loop variable .n.. However, the loop test uses .i. instead of .n.. Proposed resolution: Replace: for (int n = 0; i < newClassifiers.size(); n++) { with: for (int n = 0; n < newClassifiers.size(); n++) {