Issue 13324: Statemachine diagram in section 15.3.12 diagram 15.42 (and the text above) (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Revision Severity: Significant Summary: In the Statemachine diagram in section 15.3.12 diagram 15.42 (and the text above) it is specifying the use of 'final' to define that a redefinable element (state or transition in this case) can not be redefined. However, there is no other mention of this 'final' in the rest of the document (maybe its leftover from before?). RedefinableElement's have an isLeaf attribute which is used to determine this property. Therefore we should probably use {leaf}. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: January 23, 2009: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 22 Jan 2009 20:40:49 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Adam Neal Company: IBM mailFrom: Adam_Neal@ca.ibm.com Notification: Yes Specification: UML Section: 15.3.12 FormalNumber: 08-05-05 Version: 2.2 RevisionDate: 08-05-05 Page: 594/748 Nature: Revision Severity: Significant HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5 Description In the Statemachine diagram in section 15.3.12 diagram 15.42 (and the text above) it is specifying the use of 'final' to define that a redefinable element (state or transition in this case) can not be redefined. However, there is no other mention of this 'final' in the rest of the document (maybe its leftover from before?). RedefinableElement's have an isLeaf attribute which is used to determine this property. Therefore we should probably use {leaf}. X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:46:50 -0500 To: juergen Boldt From: Juergen Boldt Subject: Fwd: Re: UDPM issue --> issue 13224 X-Disclaimed: 54050 To: Andrius Strazdauskas Cc: Juergen Boldt , "Astle, Phil" Subject: Re: UDPM issue X-KeepSent: D4E7B4A3:568D41AD-8025753E:0035EE87; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.1 HF547 August 22, 2008 From: Graham Bleakley Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:49:34 +0000 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D06ML069/06/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 14/01/2009 09:49:36, Serialize complete at 14/01/2009 09:49:36 Sounds like it might be a good idea. Must admit i assumed ports did allow connectors otherwise they are not much use. All the best Graham Dr Graham Bleakley Principal Consultant Office: +44 (1249) 467 600 Mobile phone:+44 (7740) 881 280 Graham.Bleakley@uk.ibm.com From: Andrius Strazdauskas To: Juergen Boldt , "Astle, Phil" , Graham Bleakley/UK/IBM@IBMGB Date: 13/01/2009 13:48 Subject: UDPM issue New issue. Currently all UPDM ports have no ability to connect UPDM connectors - Needline, ResourceInterface. Suggested resolution: Improve contraints for connectors, so Ports are allowed as connector end types. Andrius -- -- Andrius Strazdauskas Product Research and Development Manager No Magic Europe Savanoriu pr. 363, LT 49425 Kaunas, Lithuania Phone: +370 37 705889 Fax: +370 37 320670 E-mail: andriuss@nomagic.com WWW: http://www.magicdraw.com -- MagicDraw - Architecture Made Simple -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services Object Management Group 140 Kendrick St Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA tel: +1 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 781 444 0320 email: juergen@omg.org www.omg.org Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:39:19 +0100 From: Birger Møller Pedersen Organization: Universitetet i Oslo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) To: Juergen Boldt , issues@omg.org, uml2-rtf@omg.org Subject: Re: issue 13324 -- UML 2 RTF issue X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO) X-UiO-Scanned: B148410B27FCE9C096528AC20C69CD27A1C55EA2 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 83.109.110.167 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 30 max/h 5 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 On 1/23/09 4:33 PM, Juergen Boldt wrote: From: webmaster@omg.org Date: 22 Jan 2009 20:40:49 -0500 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report * *Name: *Adam Neal * *Company: *IBM * *mailFrom: *Adam_Neal@ca.ibm.com * *Notification: *Yes * *Specification: *UML * *Section: *15.3.12 * *FormalNumber: *08-05-05 * *Version: *2.2 * *RevisionDate: *08-05-05 * *Page: *594/748 * *Nature: *Revision * *Severity: *Significant * *HTTP User Agent: *Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5 *Description* In the Statemachine diagram in section 15.3.12 diagram 15.42 (and the text above) it is specifying the use of 'final' to define that a redefinable element (state or transition in this case) can not be redefined. However, there is no other mention of this 'final' in the rest of the document (maybe its leftover from before?). RedefinableElement's have an isLeaf attribute which is used to determine this property. Therefore we should probably use {leaf}. That would be more consistent. To be honest I do not recall why it became this way, but I guess that isLeaf was introduced after the diagram was made. /birger * Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services Object Management Group 140 Kendrick St Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA tel: +1 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 781 444 0320 email: juergen@omg.org www.omg.org *