Issue 13867: Description of Level 1 diagram does not make sense with respect to figure 2.2 (uml2-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Page 19 and 20 of PDF. Description of Level 1 diagram does not make sense with respect to figure 2.2. "...packages merged into Level 0 and their contents are extended...," yet packages listed on figure 2.1 (Level 0 diagram) are not shown in figure 2.2 and no <<extend>> relationship is shown. Even a <<merge>> relationship between L1 and L0 would seem clear except for the defect noted next. "Note that each of the four packages shown in the figure...," but I see twelve packages shown in figure 2.2. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: April 15, 2009: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 15 Apr 2009 16:55:46 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Robert Dunn Company: individual mailFrom: robert.dunn.pmp@gmail.com Notification: Yes Specification: OMG UML, Superstructure Section: 2, Conformance FormalNumber: formal/2009-02-02 Version: 2.2 RevisionDate: 02/02/2009 Page: 3, 4 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729) Description Page 19 and 20 of PDF. Description of Level 1 diagram does not make sense with respect to figure 2.2. "...packages merged into Level 0 and their contents are extended...," yet packages listed on figure 2.1 (Level 0 diagram) are not shown in figure 2.2 and no <> relationship is shown. Even a <> relationship between L1 and L0 would seem clear except for the defect noted next. "Note that each of the four packages shown in the figure...," but I see twelve packages shown in figure 2.2. Very respectfully, Robert Dunn