Issue 13921: The superclass of ActvityNode and ActivityEdge should be RedefinableElement (fuml-ftf) Source: Model Driven Solutions (Mr. Ed Seidewitz, ed-s(at)modeldriven.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Specification: Semantics of a Foundational Subset for Executable UML Models (ptc/2008-11-03) Subclause: 7.4.2.2.2 ActivityEdge, 7.4.2.2.7 ControlNode The fUML abstract syntax currently has NamedElement as the immediate superclass of ActivityNode and ActivityEdge. However, in UML, at the level of IntermediateActivities included in the fUML subset, ActivityNode and ActivityEdge are subclasses of RedefinableElement. They should be in the fUML abstract syntax, too. Resolution: Agreed. Revised Text: see pages 54 - 55 of OMG document ptc/2009-10-02 Actions taken: May 6, 2009: received issue July 23, 2010: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== ubject: The superclass of ActvityNode and ActivityEdge should be RedefinableElement Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:46:57 -0400 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: The superclass of ActvityNode and ActivityEdge should be RedefinableElement Thread-Index: AcnOg2pnqcnC0D2GQ1Ku3MGDR9DGQg== From: "Ed Seidewitz" To: Specification: Semantics of a Foundational Subset for Executable UML Models (ptc/2008-11-03) Subclause: 7.4.2.2.2 ActivityEdge, 7.4.2.2.7 ControlNode The fUML abstract syntax currently has NamedElement as the immediate superclass of ActivityNode and ActivityEdge. However, in UML, at the level of IntermediateActivities included in the fUML subset, ActivityNode and ActivityEdge are subclasses of RedefinableElement. They should be in the fUML abstract syntax, too.