Issue 13940: Section: 14.2.8.1 (odm-rtf) Source: Thematix Partners LLC (Mrs. Elisa F. Kendall, ekendall(at)thematix.com) Nature: Revision Severity: Significant Summary: Currently, the specification of owl:DataRange uses a UML::Enumeration, which requires all of the data values that make up the enumeration to be enumeration literals. In all other places in the profile, literal strings are used to represent literals, yet one cannot use literal strings to build up data ranges given the current definition (i.e. something that is a literal string cannot also be an enumeration literal). Resolution: Resolution: Resolved to the resolution of 16498. Revised Text: Actions taken: May 29, 2009: received issue April 25, 2014: closed issue Discussion: This issue is related to issue 16498, which addresses the need for better support for data types, restrictions, data ranges, and datatype facets in general, and the resolution for it is addressed in the resolution of that issue. End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 28 May 2009 20:01:28 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Elisa Kendall Company: Sandpiper Software, Inc. mailFrom: ekendall@sandsoft.com Notification: No Specification: Ontology Definition Metamodel (ODM) Section: 14.2.8.1 FormalNumber: ptc/2008-09-07 Version: Beta 3 RevisionDate: 09/2009 Page: 180 Nature: Revision Severity: Significant HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Description Currently, the specification of owl:DataRange uses a UML::Enumeration, which requires all of the data values that make up the enumeration to be enumeration literals. In all other places in the profile, literal strings are used to represent literals, yet one cannot use literal strings to build up data ranges given the current definition (i.e. something that is a literal string cannot also be an enumeration literal).