Issue 14044: Should there be a constraint for extends equivalent to 16.3.6 [4] (uml2-rtf)
Source: Oracle (Mr. Dave Hawkins, dave.hawkins(at)oracle.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: Should there be a constraint for extends equivalent to 16.3.6 [4], that extends should be an acylic relationship between use cases?

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 1, 2009: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 01 Jul 2009 13:08:29 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name: Dave Hawkins
Company: Oracle
mailFrom: dave.hawkins@oracle.com
Notification: No
Specification: UML Superstructure
Section: 16.3.6
FormalNumber: formal/09-02-03
Version: 2.2
RevisionDate: 2/3/2009
Page: 597
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3
Description
Should there be a constraint for extends equivalent to 16.3.6 [4], that extends should be an acylic relationship between use cases?