Issue 14060: Section 8.4.4 talks about threading, but this section is really under specified (dds4ccm-ftf) Source: Remedy IT (Mr. Johnny Willemsen, jwillemsen(at)remedy.nl) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Section 8.4.4 talks about threading, but this section is really under specified. It should be much clearer how threading works and what guarantees are given. Resolution: No time to tackle it completely - deferred Revised Text: Actions taken: July 8, 2009: received issue Discussion: No time to tackle it completely. In any case, will not change the already defined interfaces. Disposition: Deferred End of Annotations:===== iler: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:45:33 -0400 To: issues@omg.org, dds4ccm-ftf@omg.org From: Juergen Boldt Subject: issue 14060 -- DDS for Lw CCM FTF issue From: webmaster@omg.org Date: 08 Jul 2009 03:53:37 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: Johnny Willemsen Company: Remedy mailFrom: jwillemsen@remedy.nl Notification: Yes Specification: DDS for Lightweight CCM Section: 8.4.4 FormalNumber: 09-02-02 Version: 1 RevisionDate: Feb 2009 Page: 44 Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor HTTP User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1) Gecko/20090624 Firefox/3.5 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) Description Section 8.4.4 talks about threading, but this section is really under specified. It should be much clearer how threading works and what guarantees are given. Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services Object Management Group 140 Kendrick St Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA tel: +1 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 781 444 0320 email: juergen@omg.org www.omg.org X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.121 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.121 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188] Reply-To: From: "Johnny Willemsen" To: Subject: issue 14060, threading Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:29:24 +0100 Organization: Remedy IT Expertise BV X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acqj6jU5G5YNXJQ0Q2SOqAyV5tDT/A== Hi, In the first FTF the threading issue 14060 has been deferred. Given the fact that there is a second ftf we would like to address this issue. To our idea there are two possible threading options, first all callbacks from DDS are delivered on the DDS thread, the other is that all callbacks are delivered on the CCM middleware threads (which would mean a task switch). Are there any other ideas about what we should standardize?