Issue 14423: BPMN 2 FTF issue on XSDs for DD / DI model transfer (bpmn2-ftf) Source: Fujitsu (Mr. Tom Rutt, tom(at)coastin.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: XSD Schemas for transfer of Model instances of DI and DD Metamodels Source: Tom Rutt (Fujitsu) Location: BPMN 2.0 Beta 1 ­ Annex B Summary of Issue: In the current BPMN 2 spec, Model instances of the BPMN2 Metamodel have two alternate forms for transfer: - XMI derived directly from the BPMN 2 Metamodel - Instances of the BPMN XSD schemas defined in BPMN 2 spec. The current Annex B of the Beta 1 BPMN 2 spec defines metamodels for Diagram Interchange (DI) and Diagram Definition (DD). However there are no BPMN XSD schemas defined for the DI and DD metamodels. Thus, it seems that XMI derived from these DI and DD metamodels currently the only normative way defined to transfer Model instances of these metamodels? The current plan is that this Annex B will be replaced with a reference to the adopted DI spec. Resolving issue involves the FTF answering two questions: 1) Is there a need to define “custom” XSD schemas, not based on XMI, as an alternative for transfer of DI and DD model instances. 2) If the answer to question 1 is yes, will these “custom” XSD schemas be defined by the BPMN 2 FTF, or the DI submitters? Resolution: 8.3.13 page 115. Change "a Message is a graphical object" to "a Message is a graphical decorator" 8.3.13 page 115. Remove the part after figure 8-28 where it talks that it can be used on choreography sub process 8.3.13 page 115. Change "can be displayed as attached (Associated) to a Message Flow" to "can be optionnaly depicted as a graphical decorator on a Message Flow" Remove Figure 8-30 page 116 8.3.13 page 116 - Under figure 8-31 change "can be displayed as Associated" to "can be depicted as a decorator" Remove the paragraph between Figure 8-32 and Figure 8-33 Remove Figure 8-33 page 117 Chapter 13 is to be replaced with the provided Chapter 13 in attached ZIP Annex B is to be replaced with the provided Annex B in attached ZIP BPMN DI schemas are to be replaced with the schemas provded in attached ZIP All files are included in the following zip file: Revised+BPMNDI+Ballot+Proposal+Apr+26.zip Note on 2010-04-26: The FTF acknowldges the proposed namespace does not follow OMG guidelines for namespace conventions. The final namespaces will be: - http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/MODEL for the semantic model XML Schema - http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/MODEL-XMI for the semantic model XMI - http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/DI for diagram interchange XML Schema - http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/DI-XMI for diagram interchange XMI xsds For Diagram Definition, the version we are including in the appendix will be: - http://www.omg.org/spec/DD/20100524/DC - http://www.omg.org/spec/DD/20100524/DI - http://www.omg.org/spec/DD/20100524/DC-XMI - http://www.omg.org/spec/DD/20100524/DI-XMI Revised Text: Actions taken: September 16, 2009: received issue October 21, 2010: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== uditID: c0a8013c-a9762bb000003c89-21-4ab12355f015 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:41:44 -0400 From: Tom Rutt Reply-To: tom@coastin.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) To: issues@omg.org, Tom Rutt , Juergen Boldt Subject: New BPMN 2 FTF issue on XSDs for DD / DI model transfer X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAARDQNYg= X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by amethyst.omg.org id n8GHfF0G012784 XSD Schemas for transfer of Model instances of DI and DD Metamodels Source: Tom Rutt (Fujitsu) Location: BPMN 2.0 Beta 1 ­ Annex B Summary of Issue: In the current BPMN 2 spec, Model instances of the BPMN2 Metamodel have two alternate forms for transfer: - XMI derived directly from the BPMN 2 Metamodel - Instances of the BPMN XSD schemas defined in BPMN 2 spec. The current Annex B of the Beta 1 BPMN 2 spec defines metamodels for Diagram Interchange (DI) and Diagram Definition (DD). However there are no BPMN XSD schemas defined for the DI and DD metamodels. Thus, it seems that XMI derived from these DI and DD metamodels currently the only normative way defined to transfer Model instances of these metamodels? The current plan is that this Annex B will be replaced with a reference to the adopted DI spec. Resolving issue involves the FTF answering two questions: 1) Is there a need to define .custom. XSD schemas, not based on XMI, as an alternative for transfer of DI and DD model instances. 2) If the answer to question 1 is yes, will these .custom. XSD schemas be defined by the BPMN 2 FTF, or the DI submitters? -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133