Issue 1448:  Re-define AggregationKind (boca-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Revision
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: Section 2.2.4 (BOCA Meta-Model in CDL)
 
 enum AggregationKind{
         NOT_AGGREGATE,
         IS_AGGREGATE,
         IS_COMPOSITE};
 
 AggregationKind is modeled after a corresponding data type in UML.  However, the names of the values 
 differ needlessly from those of UML  Perhaps these names fit the BOCA style better.  However, it is more 
 important not to cause any confusion to those familiar with UML.
 
 Recommendation:  Define AggregationKind as follows:
 
 enum AggregationKind{
         NONE,
         SHARED,
         COMPOSITE};

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
June 3, 1998: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
*ISSUE 20*

Section 2.2.4 (BOCA Meta-Model in CDL)

enum AggregationKind{
        NOT_AGGREGATE,
        IS_AGGREGATE,
        IS_COMPOSITE};

AggregationKind is modeled after a corresponding data type in UML.
However, the names of the values 
differ needlessly from those of UML  Perhaps these names fit the BOCA
style better.  However, it is more 
important not to cause any confusion to those familiar with UML.

Recommendation:  Define AggregationKind as follows:

enum AggregationKind{
        NONE,
        SHARED,
        COMPOSITE}