Issue 14549: Wrong Chapter reference on Page 2 Language Dimension (qvt-rtf) Source: (, ) Nature: Revision Severity: Minor Summary: Original file: ptc/07-07-08.zip OMG Document Nmber: formal/2008-04-03 Standard document URL http://www.omg.org/spec/QVT/1.0/PDF On Page 2 (Page 18 in PDF) there is a wrong reference in chapter 2.2 Language Dimension at 1. and 2. "Core; The Core language is described in Chapter 11.." "Relations: The Relations language is described in Chapter 9. ..." It should be 9 and 7 ;) Resolution: The Chapter 10 reference is wrong too. Further wrong Chapter 9/11 references exist in the main text. The above references are manual text that do not use FrameMaker cross-reference facilities. Loading the QVT 1.1 FrameMaker files reveals 6 unresolved cross-references. OMG specifications have Clauses not Chapters. Revised Text: <Review all cross-references and correct stale definitions> <Replace all usage of Chapter by a cross reference to the corresponding clause> Actions taken: October 9, 2009: received issue July 15, 2014: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 09 Oct 2009 04:48:39 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Markus von Rüden Company: InterComponentWare AG mailFrom: markus.vonrueden@icw.de Notification: Yes Specification: Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification Section: 2/2.2 Language Dimension FormalNumber: 08-04-03.pdf Version: 1.0 RevisionDate: April 2008 Page: 2 (18 in pdf) Title: Wrong Chapter reference on Page 2 Language Dimension Nature: Revision Severity: Minor test: 3qw8 B1: Report Issue Description: Original file: ptc/07-07-08.zip OMG Document Nmber: formal/2008-04-03 Standard document URL http://www.omg.org/spec/QVT/1.0/PDF On Page 2 (Page 18 in PDF) there is a wrong reference in chapter 2.2 Language Dimension at 1. and 2. "Core; The Core language is described in Chapter 11.." "Relations: The Relations language is described in Chapter 9. ..." It should be 9 and 7 ;) Kind regards Markus von Rüden