Issue 1462:  relationship_kind declaration issue (02) (boca-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Revision
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: Section 2.2.4 (BOCA Meta-Model in CDL)
 
 Another issue with the relationship_kind declarations:  They should include specifications of the value of the 
 aggregation attribute inherited from BocaRelationshipReference. 
 

Resolution: 
Revised Text:   They should include specifications of the value of the 
Actions taken:
June 3, 1998: received issue
June 23, 1998: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
*ISSUE 33*

Section 2.2.4 (BOCA Meta-Model in CDL)

Another issue with the relationship_kind declarations:  They should
include specifications of the value of the 
aggregation attribute inherited from BocaRelationshipReference. 

Recommendation: The following table describes the proper declarations
values for aggregation:

relationship_kind
aggregation attribute value declaration
References
[is_locked, is_read_only, MANAGER] attribute AggregationKind
aggregation = NONE;
Aggregates
[is_locked, is_read_only, MANAGER] attribute AggregationKind
aggregation = SHARED;
IsOwnedBy
[is_locked, is_read_only, MANAGER] attribute AggregationKind
aggregation = NONE;
Composes
[is_locked, is_read_only, MANAGER] attribute AggregationKind
aggregation = COMPOSITE;
IsPartOf
[is_locked, is_read_only, MANAGER] attribute AggregationKind
aggregation = NONE;
Uses
[is_locked, is_read_only, MANAGER] attribute AggregationKind
aggregation = NONE;
Adapter
[is_locked, is_read_only, MANAGER] attribute AggregationKind
aggregation = NONE;
HasRole
[is_locked, is_read_only, MANAGER] attribute AggregationKind
aggregation = COMPOSITE; *
RoleOf
[is_locked, is_read_only, MANAGER] attribute AggregationKind
aggregation = NONE;

* Should be discussed furthe