Issue 14649: Key-based Correlation => ? (bpmn2-ftf)
Source: NIST (Mr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Significant
Summary: Key-based correlation could have a better name, because context-based
correlation (subscription) also uses keys, it just enables values for
process keys to change over time.  Perhaps the term could be "static
correlation", meaning the values of process properties do not change
over time (though values and keys can be added).  BTW, "context-based"
for subscription is equally vague.  How about static vs dynamic
correlation?

Resolution: The terms "key-based" and "context-based" are common in the area of
correlation, it's best to leave them as they are.
Disposition: Closed, No Change
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
November 19, 2009: received issue
November 19, 2009: received issue
October 21, 2010: closed issue
October 21, 2010: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 14649

[OMG 14649] Key-based Correlation => ?

##Source: NIST (Conrad Bock, conrad.bock@nist.gov)
##Original Issue: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BPMN-584
##Original Info: (Severity: Significant - Nature: Revision)

Key-based correlation could have a better name, because context-based
correlation (subscription) also uses keys, it just enables values for
process keys to change over time.  Perhaps the term could be "static
correlation", meaning the values of process properties do not change
over time (though values and keys can be added).  BTW, "context-based"
for subscription is equally vague.  How about static vs dynamic
correlation?