Issue 14663: Interactions supporting interactions (bpmn2-rtf) Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov) Nature: Revision Severity: Significant Summary: When a business commits to an interaction with potential business partners, it might be that a particular partner needs only some of the interaction. This would be specified in another interaction diagram. The modeler needs to link these two interactions to say one supports the other, with the same semantics of the currently supports association, except applied to messaging rather than activities. The supports association should be generalized to cover interactions Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: November 19, 2009: received issue Discussion: The beta specification currently enables abstraction in processes, but not interactions, which is inconsistent and disables common interaction use cases, for example as described in the issue. Resolving this requires a modeler declaration indicating "runtime" message exchanges between businesses following one interaction also follow another. This means message exchanges can occur in reality that are not modeled in the more abstract interaction model. The resolution would be very similar to the same capability for processes, but requires explanation and examples, which can be provided in RTF, and coordination with resolution of 14686. Disposition: Deferred End of Annotations:===== s is issue # 14663 [OMG 14663] Interactions supporting interactions ##Source: NIST (Conrad Bock, conrad.bock@nist.gov) ##Original Issue: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BPMN-570 ##Original Info: (Severity: Significant - Nature: Revision) When a business commits to an interaction with potential business partners, it might be that a particular partner needs only some of the interaction. This would be specified in another interaction diagram. The modeler needs to link these two interactions to say one supports the other, with the same semantics of the currently supports association, except applied to messaging rather than activities. The supports association should be generalized to cover interactions.