Issue 14903: Inconsistency between the Time domain model and related profile (marte-rtf)
Source: THALES (Mr. Sebastien Demathieu, sebastien.demathieu(at)thalesgroup.com)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Critical
Summary: In the domain model, TimeProcessing.duration is a simple association, typed by CVS::DurationValueSpecification while in the profile the association is a composition, typed by ValueSpecification. Inconsistency should be corrected
Resolution: In the domain view, the intent was to refer to a value (a duration value) and a
value exists independently of its specification and therefore cannot be owned. In
the UML representation, in practice, we use a specification to denote the value
and there is no reason for the specification not to be owned by another element.
The resolution proposes to keep the association in the domain view but refer to
the metaclass DurationValue instead of CVS::DurationValueSpecification. This
partly addresses also the issue 14912, stating that
CVS::DurationValueSpecification being non normative should not be used in a
normative part. The composition with a ValueSpecification is maintained in the
profile. This is consistent with the different roles played by a value and one of its
possible specifications.
Revised Text: see pages 85 - 86 of ptc/2010-08-30 for resolution
Actions taken:
December 31, 2009: received issue
December 31, 2009: received issue
January 14, 2011: closed issue
January 14, 2011: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 31 Dec 2009 07:49:17 -0500
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:          Séstien Demathieu
Company:       Thales
mailFrom:      sebastien.demathieu@thalesgroup.com
Notification:  Yes
Specification: MARTE
Section:       Time
FormalNumber:  09-11-02
Version:       1.0
RevisionDate:  11/2009
Page:          73
Title:         Inconsistency between the Time domain model and related profile
Nature:        Revision
Severity:      Critical
test:          3qw8
B1:            Report Issue


Description:


<Down>
<Down>
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,294,1267398000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="59548011"
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:43:59 +0100
From: Frederic Mallet <Frederic.Mallet@sophia.inria.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
To: marte-rtf@omg.org
CC: DEMATHIEU Séstien
 <sebastien.demathieu@thalesgroup.com>
Subject: Issue 14903


Time_wg,
There was a mistake in the figure of resolution 14903. The class
TimedBehavior appeared twice and TimedMessage was missing.
It does not change the resolution, I have updated the wiki accordingly.


Many thanks to Séstien D. who has spotted the mistake.


Cheers,


In the domain model, TimeProcessing.duration is a simple association, typed by CVS::DurationValueSpecification while in the profile the association is a composition, typed by ValueSpecification. Inconsistency should be corrected.