Issue 14950: UML: Better Definition of Compliance (uml2-rtf) Source: Change Vision (Mr. Michael Jesse Chonoles, mjchonoles(at)yahoo.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Diagram / Model Interchange The current level of Diagram and Model interchangeability is appalling and is a significant barrier to further penetration of UML/SysML Into the marketplace. With the advent of new test suites (such as by OMG’s Model Interchange Working Group (MIWG)), the UML specification should require demonstrated success in some of these tests before a UML tool can be declared conforming to UML. OCL Support A minimal required support for OCL should be defined as part of compliance. QVT Support A minimal required support for QVT should be defined as part of compliance. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: January 11, 2010: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== te: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:02:34 -0500 From: "Chonoles, Michael J" Subject: UM:: Better Definition of Compliance To: "issues@omg.org" Thread-Topic: UM:: Better Definition of Compliance Thread-Index: AcqSg6o2qqWV58HYRDeguVjnyxvUmQ== Accept-Language: en-US acceptlanguage: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Diagram / Model Interchange The current level of Diagram and Model interchangeability is appalling and is a significant barrier to further penetration of UML/SysML Into the marketplace. With the advent of new test suites (such as by OMG.s Model Interchange Working Group (MIWG)), the UML specification should require demonstrated success in some of these tests before a UML tool can be declared conforming to UML. OCL Support A minimal required support for OCL should be defined as part of compliance. QVT Support A minimal required support for QVT should be defined as part of compliance. Michael Jesse Chonoles LMCO/OMG SE-DSIG