Issue 14953: UML: Improve Sequence Diagram Semantics (3-issues) (uml2-rtf)
Source: Change Vision (Mr. Michael Jesse Chonoles, mjchonoles(at)yahoo.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: UML is missing useful sequence diagram support for.

 

1)      Information Flows

2)      Continuous or Repeating messages (for example, on the 200th heart beat message)

3)      Improved timing semantics (requirements for min/max timing)

 

Without these features, it will not be possible to represent common situations on sequence diagrams or specify realtime behavior. It may also prevent mapping to state diagrams. 

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
January 11, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 


End of Annotations:=====
te: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:20:59 -0500
From: "Chonoles, Michael J" <michael.j.chonoles@lmco.com>
Subject: UML: Improve Sequence Diagram Semantics (3-issues)
To: "issues@omg.org" <issues@omg.org>
Thread-Topic: UML: Improve Sequence Diagram Semantics (3-issues)
Thread-Index: AcqShjxOfvNBNV59Q/SDnCAQb0kEQw==
Accept-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 


UML is missing useful sequence diagram support for.

 

1)      Information Flows

2)      Continuous or Repeating messages (for example, on the 200th heart beat message)

3)      Improved timing semantics (requirements for min/max timing)

 

Without these features, it will not be possible to represent common situations on sequence diagrams or specify realtime behavior. It may also prevent mapping to state diagrams. 

 

Michael Jesse Chonoles

LMCO/OMG-SE-DSIG