Issue 14983: OCL 2.1 11.7 Missing OrderedSet::excluding and including (ocl2-rtf)
Source: Model Driven Solutions (Dr. Edward Willink, ed(at)willink.me.uk)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: excluding and including are defined for Bag, Sequence and Set but not OrderedSet or Collection.


The Collections would be more consistent with an OrderedSet::excluding and an OrderedSet::including.


With all concrete Collection types defining excluding and including, the abstract Collection could also
define Collection ::excluding and an Collection ::including supporting fully polymorphic addition and
querying of collections.

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
January 17, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
ronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAPXxUkvUnw4T/2dsb2JhbADUIoQyBA
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:20:30 +0000
From: Ed Willink <ed@willink.me.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
To: issues@omg.org
Subject: OCL 2.1 11.7 Missing OrderedSet::excluding and including
X-Plusnet-Relay: 7c4e8f2b2d07e34ed541ce6f4378852f


Hi


excluding and including are defined for Bag, Sequence and Set but not OrderedSet or Collection.


The Collections would be more consistent with an OrderedSet::excluding and an OrderedSet::including.


With all concrete Collection types defining excluding and including, the abstract Collection could also
define Collection ::excluding and an Collection ::including supporting fully polymorphic addition and
querying of collections.


    Regards


        Ed Willink