Issue 15127: Corrections to previous resolutions (fuml-ftf) Source: Model Driven Solutions (Mr. Ed Seidewitz, ed-s(at)modeldriven.com) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: The resolution text for the following fUML issues had minor errors and inconsistencies. The following points reflect the correct interpretation for changes to be made to the specification according to these resolutions. Issue 13435: Type "instanceVistor" for "instanceVisitor" occurs in a number of places, but not in any of the revised code snippets. The correct spelling is “instanceVisitor”. Issue 14545: The revised code includes "super.isReady" instead of "super.isReady()", which is clearly a syntax error. The correct code is “super.isReady()”. Issue 14550: The resolution refers to changing "Behavior::isReentrant" in Subclause 7.3.2.2.4, while the correct Behavior subclause is actually 7.3.2.2.1. Issue 14550: The resolution says to add an operation "countOfferedValues" to the class ObjectNodeActivation, but then refers to this operation in one place later as "countTotalValues". The correct operation name is “countOfferedValues”. Issue 14618: The revised text section of the resolution refers to “Subclause 8.6.2.2.15, ObjectNodeActivation”, whereas the ccorrect ObjectNodeActivation subclause is 8.5.2.2.15 (as given in the issue summary). Resolution: Agreed. Revised Text: · For Issue 13435, the correct operation name is "instanceVisitor". · For Issue 14545, in Subclause 8.6.2.2.5 InputPinActivation, the revised code in the receiveOffer operation should include "super.isReady()" instead of "super.isReady". · For Issue 14550, the default value for Behavior::isReentrant should be changed to "true" in Subclause 7.3.2.2.1, rather than 7.3.2.2.4 and the operation added to ObjectNodeActivation in Subclause 8.5.2.2.15 should be called "countOfferedValues". · For Issue 14618, the entry for "unofferedTokens" should be removed from Subclause 8.5.2.2.15 rather than 8.6.2.2.15. Actions taken: March 17, 2010: received issue July 23, 2010: closed issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== iler: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:03:52 -0400 To: issues@omg.org, fuml-ftyf@omg.org From: Juergen Boldt Subject: issue 15127 -- FUML FTF issue Subject: Corrections to previous resolutions Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:12:43 -0400 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Corrections to previous resolutions thread-index: AcrF04eR9t/96nyeQJm63iDeRV/Gzw== From: "Ed Seidewitz" To: The resolution text for the following fUML issues had minor errors and inconsistencies. The following points reflect the correct interpretation for changes to be made to the specification according to these resolutions. Issue 13435: Type "instanceVistor" for "instanceVisitor" occurs in a number of places, but not in any of the revised code snippets. The correct spelling is .instanceVisitor.. Issue 14545: The revised code includes "super.isReady" instead of "super.isReady()", which is clearly a syntax error. The correct code is .super.isReady().. Issue 14550: The resolution refers to changing "Behavior::isReentrant" in Subclause 7.3.2.2.4, while the correct Behavior subclause is actually 7.3.2.2.1. Issue 14550: The resolution says to add an operation "countOfferedValues" to the class ObjectNodeActivation, but then refers to this operation in one place later as "countTotalValues". The correct operation name is .countOfferedValues.. Issue 14618: The revised text section of the resolution refers to .Subclause 8.6.2.2.15, ObjectNodeActivation., whereas the ccorrect ObjectNodeActivation subclause is 8.5.2.2.15 (as given in the issue summary). Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services Object Management Group 140 Kendrick St Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA tel: +1 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 781 444 0320 email: juergen@omg.org www.omg.org