Issue 15135: wrong figure in the document (soaml-rtf)
Source: Thematix Partners LLC (Mr. James J. Odell, email(at)jamesodell.com)
Nature: Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Subject: FW: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bis
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:35:37 -0500
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bis
thread-index: AcrCGzfTouMfZVwkYEGlviuBN+fz/AAAZoigAACYR7EAAxmX4AAAEg7w
From: "Cory Casanave" <cory-c@modeldriven.com>
To: <soaml-ftf@omg.org>


Note that there is a wrong figure in the document, see below.

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Cory Casanave 
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 4:35 PM
To: 'James Odell'
Cc: Ed Seidewitz
Subject: RE: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bis

 

The first figure should be:



However the doc numbers don’t match -  the FTF report doc is 09-11-14

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: James Odell [mailto:email@jamesodell.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 3:04 PM
To: Cory Casanave
Subject: Re: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bis

 

In the downlodable doc, it’s Figs 15 and 16; on SoaML.docx, it Figs 17 and 18.

-Jim



On 3/12/10 2:48 PM, "Cory Casanave" indited:

Jim,
Which document are you looking at ? In SoaML.docx this is not figure a6.
-Cory
 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: James Odell [mailto:email@jamesodell.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:36 PM
To: Cory Casanave
Subject: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2

Cory,

Sorry, I included the wrong images on the last one.
Now, Figs 15 and 16 are identical, but the text describing Fig 16 does not jibe with figure.  Can you tell me what Fig 16 should look like?


Thanks,

Jim


Real Fig. 15



Real Fig. 16 




Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
March 12, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
ubject: FW: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bis
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:35:37 -0500
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bis
thread-index: AcrCGzfTouMfZVwkYEGlviuBN+fz/AAAZoigAACYR7EAAxmX4AAAEg7w
From: "Cory Casanave" <cory-c@modeldriven.com>
To: <soaml-ftf@omg.org>


Note that there is a wrong figure in the document, see below.

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Cory Casanave 
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 4:35 PM
To: 'James Odell'
Cc: Ed Seidewitz
Subject: RE: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bis

 

The first figure should be:



However the doc numbers don.t match -  the FTF report doc is 09-11-14

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: James Odell [mailto:email@jamesodell.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 3:04 PM
To: Cory Casanave
Subject: Re: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2 - bis

 

In the downlodable doc, it.s Figs 15 and 16; on SoaML.docx, it Figs 17 and 18.

-Jim



On 3/12/10 2:48 PM, "Cory Casanave" indited:

Jim,
Which document are you looking at ? In SoaML.docx this is not figure a6.
-Cory
 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: James Odell [mailto:email@jamesodell.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:36 PM
To: Cory Casanave
Subject: SoaML Beta 2 question - v2

Cory,

Sorry, I included the wrong images on the last one.
Now, Figs 15 and 16 are identical, but the text describing Fig 16 does not jibe with figure.  Can you tell me what Fig 16 should look like?


Thanks,

Jim


Real Fig. 15



Real Fig. 16