Issue 15158: Lists of values (bpmn2-rtf)
Source: NIST (Dr. Conrad Bock, conrad.bock(at)nist.gov)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: The word "list" is used a fair amount in describing attributes and model
associations.  I think these are intended to be sets in most cases,
rather than lists (no ordering, no duplicates).  In UML, the default is
sets, you need to add "{ordered}" "{non-unique}" to get lists.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
April 5, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 
This is a problem in the specification, but was noticed too late to
address in the FTF.
Disposition: Deferred
End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 05 Apr 2010 11:51:34 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:          Conrad Bock
Company:       NIST
mailFrom:      conrad.bock@nist.gov
Notification:  No
Specification: BPMN 2
Section:        
FormalNumber:  dtc/2009-08-14
Version:        
RevisionDate:   
Page:           
Title:         Lists of values
Nature:        Clarification
Severity:      Minor
test:          3qw8
B1:            Report Issue


Description:


The word "list" is used a fair amount in describing attributes and model
associations.  I think these are intended to be sets in most cases,
rather than lists (no ordering, no duplicates).  In UML, the default is
sets, you need to add "{ordered}" "{non-unique}" to get lists.