Issue 15255: Define rules for placement of multiple activity markers (bpmn2-rtf)
Source: Department of Veterans Affairs (Dr. Stephen White, steve.white(at)bookzurman.com)
Nature: Clarification
Severity: Minor
Summary: A Task or Sub-Process may have multiple markers (e.g., looping, compensation, etc.). But the spec does not explicitly define how the markers should be ordered. The examples in the spec are not consistent in how they are presented.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
May 17, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 17 May 2010 20:40:47 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:          Stephen A. White
Company:       IBM
mailFrom:      wstephe@us.ibm.com
Notification:  No
Specification: BPMN 2.0 Beta
Section:       Chapter 10.2
FormalNumber:  dtc/2009-08-14
Version:       Beta 1
RevisionDate:  August 2009
Page:          127
Title:         Define rules for placement of multiple activity markers
Nature:        Clarification
Severity:      Minor
test:          3qw8
B1:            Report Issue


Description:

A Task or Sub-Process may have multiple markers (e.g., looping, compensation, etc.). But the spec does not explicitly define how the markers should be ordered. The examples in the spec are not consistent in how they are presented.