Issue 15262: Fig. 5.5 (rtc-ftf) Source: (, ) Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor Summary: Fig. 5.5, Although it is repeated and emphasized under Error Handling subtitle (on page 15), I propose that the following words "reset_component" be added on the return path from Error[1], Error[2], and Error[3] to Inactive[1], Inactive[2] and Inactive[n] respectively. There is no harm in repeating the same as long as it makes the specification clear to understand. General Comment: I propose the inclusion of a chapter on "Definitions" of some terms that may not seem obvious to some developers/users. May be it is not a requirement by OMG, but it is the International Practice to define some terms in such a specification. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: May 25, 2010: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: webmaster@omg.org Date: 25 May 2010 02:45:14 -0400 To: Subject: Issue/Bug Report ******************************************************************************* Name: Zacharia Chepkania Company: Kenya Bureau of Standards mailFrom: lukorito@yahoo.com Notification: Yes Specification: Robot Technology Component Specification Section: Fig. 5.5 FormalNumber: 2008-04-04 Version: 1.0 RevisionDate: April 2008 Page: 14 Title: Robot Technology Component Specification Nature: Clarification Severity: Minor test: 3qw8 B1: Report Issue Description: Fig. 5.5, Although it is repeated and emphasized under Error Handling subtitle (on page 15), I propose that the following words "reset_component" be added on the return path from Error[1], Error[2], and Error[3] to Inactive[1], Inactive[2] and Inactive[n] respectively. There is no harm in repeating the same as long as it makes the specification clear to understand. General Comment: I propose the inclusion of a chapter on "Definitions" of some terms that may not seem obvious to some developers/users. May be it is not a requirement by OMG, but it is the International Practice to define some terms in such a specification.