Issue 1527:  TypeCodes defined in section 5.8.2 (obv-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature:  Uncategorized Issue
Severity: 
Summary: Summary: 1) The fill_in_recursive_sequence_tc method is intended to act
    upon an existing "tk_value" TypeCode.  The signature indicates
    that it should return a TypeCode pointer.
 
    What TypeCode is supposed to be returned ?
    If the signature is in error, the specification should
    be corrected -- if not, the specification requires
    some additional explanation as to which TypeCode
    needs to be returned.
 

Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
June 18, 1998: received issue
July 30, 1998: closed issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
Return-Path: <nash@sp3at21.hursley.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 00:24:44 +0100
From: Simon Nash <nash@hursley.ibm.com>
Reply-To: nash@hursley.ibm.com
Organization: IBM
To: obv-rtf@omg.org, issues@omg.org
Subject: TypeCode issues

I received some questions from the IBM implementers of the new ORB
operations for TypeCodes defined in section 5.8.2.
 
1) The fill_in_recursive_sequence_tc method is intended to act
   upon an existing "tk_value" TypeCode.  The signature indicates
   that it should return a TypeCode pointer.

   What TypeCode is supposed to be returned ?
   If the signature is in error, the specification should
   be corrected -- if not, the specification requires
   some additional explanation as to which TypeCode
   needs to be returned.