Issue 15339: Figure 51: Interfaces (soaml-rtf)
Source: SINTEF (Brian Elvesæter, brian.elvesater(at)sintef.no)
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
Summary: The interfaces should be stereotyped <<Consumer>> and <<Provider>>.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
July 1, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====
s is issue # 15339	From: Brian Elvesær <Brian.Elvesater@sintef.no>

Figure 51: Interfaces

The interfaces should be stereotyped <<Consumer>> and <<Provider>>.



From: Steve Cook <Steve.Cook@microsoft.com>
To: "BERNARD, Yves" <Yves.Bernard@airbus.com>,
        "uml25-ftf@omg.org"
        <uml25-ftf@omg.org>
Subject: RE: [UML 2.5 FTF] ballot4 : #15339 "Unique" annotation
Thread-Topic: [UML 2.5 FTF] ballot4 : #15339 "Unique" annotation
Thread-Index: Ac46h84x0JMupwVSTk+nRmigPRIlqQFhva6A
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:42:46 +0000
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.166.18.102]
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: 
 CIP:131.107.125.37;CTRY:US;IPV:CAL;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(199002)(189002)(365934001)(47736001)(20776003)(63696002)(71186001)(15202345002)(59766001)(46102001)(56816002)(65816001)(80022001)(54356001)(33656001)(76482001)(56776001)(44976003)(81342001)(50986001)(77982001)(79102001)(49866001)(16406001)(69226001)(564824004)(81542001)(74502001)(6806003)(47446002)(4396001)(512954001)(16236675002)(54316002)(51856001)(53806001)(55846006)(47976001)(74662001)(31966008);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2FFO11HUB037;H:TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com;RD:InfoDomainNonexistent;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-Forefront-PRVS: 08252193F3
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omg.org


Yves

 

I disagree.  The issue asked whether we need both unique/nonunique and ordered/unordered annotations.  The previous spec answered these points inconsistently.  The resolution makes it clear that all of these annotations are allowed.  Disallowing any of them at this point would remove previously existing capabilities of UML.

 

-- Steve

 

From: BERNARD, Yves [mailto:Yves.Bernard@airbus.com] 
Sent: 16 April 2013 10:50
To: uml25-ftf@omg.org
Subject: [UML 2.5 FTF] ballot4 : #15339 "Unique" annotation

 

The proposed resolution does not answer the concern Maged expressed. 

 

His main point is about the utility of some textual annotations which correspond to default values, while the resolution focus on the diagrams inconsistency that Maged only gave for illustration.

 

Yves

 

The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone other than the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Airbus immediately and delete this e-mail.
Airbus cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this e-mail as it has been sent over public networks. If you have any concerns over the content of this message or its Accuracy or Integrity, please contact Airbus immediately.
All outgoing e-mails from Airbus are checked using regularly updated virus scanning software but you should take whatever measures you deem to be appropriate to ensure that this message and any attachments are virus free.