Issue 15485: UML 2 issue: connectors typed by Association Class (uml2-rtf) Source: Model Driven Solutions (Mr. Steve Cook, steve-c(at)modeldriven.org) Nature: Uncategorized Issue Severity: Summary: Multiple tool vendors have failed to implement support for a Connector that has a type of an AssociationClass. This may be partly due to the fact that Connector (9.3.6) doesn’t explicitly describe this variation under type. Nor does any example show this use. I would expect that the properties/methods of Connector that has a type of an AssociationClass to be represented similarly to representation of an AssociationClass between Classes. Resolution: Revised Text: Actions taken: September 10, 2010: received issue Discussion: End of Annotations:===== m: Steve Cook To: "issues@omg.org" Subject: UML 2 issue: connectors typed by Association Class. Thread-Topic: UML 2 issue: connectors typed by Association Class. Thread-Index: ActQ/zVgudvQlB5uTVSiA+gOszcrZw== Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:45:58 +0000 Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.166.20.234] Multiple tool vendors have failed to implement support for a Connector that has a type of an AssociationClass. This may be partly due to the fact that Connector (9.3.6) doesn.t explicitly describe this variation under type. Nor does any example show this use. I would expect that the properties/methods of Connector that has a type of an AssociationClass to be represented similarly to representation of an AssociationClass between Classes. To: , , From: "Tim Weilkiens" Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:20:04 +0200 X-Mailer: TouchDown thread-topic: issue 15485 -- UML 2 RTF issue thread-index: ActSW68/bl+ilkF4TlKFpW9DR+MLiA== Subject: RE: issue 15485 -- UML 2 RTF issue The SysML specification defines a connector for a association class and has some examples. Tim -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Boldt [juergen@omg.org] Received: 10.09.10 18:02 To: issues@omg.org [issues@omg.org]; uml2-rtf@omg.org [uml2-rtf@omg.org] Subject: issue 15485 -- UML 2 RTF issue >From: Steve Cook >To: "issues@omg.org" >Subject: UML 2 issue: connectors typed by Association Class. >Thread-Topic: UML 2 issue: connectors typed by Association Class. >Thread-Index: ActQ/zVgudvQlB5uTVSiA+gOszcrZw== >Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:45:58 +0000 >Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US >X-MS-Has-Attach: >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: >x-originating-ip: [10.166.20.234] > >Multiple tool vendors have failed to implement support for a >Connector that has a type of an AssociationClass. This may be >partly due to the fact that Connector (9.3.6) doesn't explicitly >describe this variation under type. Nor does any example show this >use. I would expect that the properties/methods of Connector that >has a type of an AssociationClass to be represented similarly to >representation of an AssociationClass between Classes. Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services Object Management Group 140 Kendrick St Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA tel: +1 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 781 444 0320 email: juergen@omg.org www.omg.org To: , , From: "Tim Weilkiens" Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:20:04 +0200 X-Mailer: TouchDown thread-topic: issue 15485 -- UML 2 RTF issue thread-index: ActSW68/bl+ilkF4TlKFpW9DR+MLiA== Subject: RE: issue 15485 -- UML 2 RTF issue The SysML specification defines a connector for a association class and has some examples. Tim -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Boldt [juergen@omg.org] Received: 10.09.10 18:02 To: issues@omg.org [issues@omg.org]; uml2-rtf@omg.org [uml2-rtf@omg.org] Subject: issue 15485 -- UML 2 RTF issue >From: Steve Cook >To: "issues@omg.org" >Subject: UML 2 issue: connectors typed by Association Class. >Thread-Topic: UML 2 issue: connectors typed by Association Class. >Thread-Index: ActQ/zVgudvQlB5uTVSiA+gOszcrZw== >Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:45:58 +0000 >Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US >X-MS-Has-Attach: >X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: >x-originating-ip: [10.166.20.234] > >Multiple tool vendors have failed to implement support for a >Connector that has a type of an AssociationClass. This may be >partly due to the fact that Connector (9.3.6) doesn't explicitly >describe this variation under type. Nor does any example show this >use. I would expect that the properties/methods of Connector that >has a type of an AssociationClass to be represented similarly to >representation of an AssociationClass between Classes. Juergen Boldt Director, Member Services Object Management Group 140 Kendrick St Building A Suite 300 Needham, MA 02494 USA tel: +1 781 444 0404 x 132 fax: +1 781 444 0320 email: juergen@omg.org www.omg.org