Issue 15516: Page 110. Wrong use of UML concept “aggregation”. (bpmn2-rtf)
Source:  (, )
Nature: Revision
Severity: Minor
Summary: In Table 9.1. Row “conversations”. 


It says
 “The conversations model aggregation relationship allows a Collaboration to contain …”


It should say 
“The conversations model composition relationship allows a Collaboration to contain …”

In Figure 9.1 (p. 109), the line “begins” with a filled mini-diamond, which represents a composition, not an aggregation.
Resolution: 
Revised Text: 
Actions taken:
September 13, 2010: received issue
Discussion: 

End of Annotations:=====

m: webmaster@omg.org
Date: 12 Sep 2010 23:44:52 -0400
To: <issues@omg.org>
Subject: Issue/Bug Report


*******************************************************************************
Name:            Eduardo Jara
Employer:        
mailFrom:        ejara@craftware.net
Terms_Agreement: I agree
Specification:   BPMN 2.0 Beta 2
Section:         9
FormalNumber:    dtc/2010-06-05
Version:         2.0
Doc_Year:        2010
Doc_Month:       June
Doc_Day:         Day
Page:            110
Title:           Page 110. Wrong use of UML concept .aggregation..
Nature:          Revision
Severity:        Minor
CODE:            3TMw8
B1:              Report Issue


Description:


In Table 9.1. Row .conversations.. 


It says
 .The conversations model aggregation relationship allows a Collaboration to contain ..


It should say 
.The conversations model composition relationship allows a Collaboration to contain ..

In Figure 9.1 (p. 109), the line .begins. with a filled mini-diamond, which represents a composition, not an aggregation.